-
10-12-2007, 08:20 AM #21
Star Spokesman
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 1,993
Re: Article on officiating in the Vikings/ Packers game
We have had our share of bad calls over the years.
The football gods have not been good to us.
It all started in 1975 with the playoff loss to Dallas.
Why is it that I can remember losing games because of bad officiating, but I cannot recall one single victory where the officials helped us win a game.
Is it selective memory?
Can anyone remember a bad call going against any of our opponents that enabled us to win a game that we should have lost?
-
Re: Article on officiating in the Vikings/ Packers game
"vikingivan" wrote:
Good teams win despite bad calls.We have had our share of bad calls over the years.
The football gods have not been good to us.
It all started in 1975 with the playoff loss to Dallas.
Why is it that I can remember losing games because of bad officiating, but I cannot recall one single victory where the officials helped us win a game.
Is it selective memory?
Can anyone remember a bad call going against any of our opponents that enabled us to win a game that we should have lost?
Blaming the ref's bad call for us losing the game is a lot like blaming Gary Anderson's missed field goal for us not going to the super bowl in 98.
There were plenty of other things that could have happened in both games that would have rendered both plays moot.Zeus wrote:
When are you going to realize that picking out the 20 bad throws this year and ignoring the 300 good ones does not make your point?
=Z=
-
10-12-2007, 08:44 AM #23
Star Spokesman
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 1,993
Re: Article on officiating in the Vikings/ Packers game
"NodakPaul" wrote:
Some good teams win despite bad calls, not all."vikingivan" wrote:
Good teams win despite bad calls.We have had our share of bad calls over the years.
The football gods have not been good to us.
It all started in 1975 with the playoff loss to Dallas.
Why is it that I can remember losing games because of bad officiating, but I cannot recall one single victory where the officials helped us win a game.
Is it selective memory?
Can anyone remember a bad call going against any of our opponents that enabled us to win a game that we should have lost?
Blaming the ref's bad call for us losing the game is a lot like blaming Gary Anderson's missed field goal for us not going to the super bowl in 98.
There were plenty of other things that could have happened in both games that would have rendered both plays moot.
How were we to overcome the terrible call at the end of the Dallas playoff game in 75?
I don't blame Gary Anderson for losing that game in 98.
I blame the coaches Billick and Green.
But in the end, that game did not turn on officiating.
The game was decided on the field.
Players and Coaches should win or lose games.
Not officials.
-
10-12-2007, 08:53 AM #24
Re: Article on officiating in the Vikings/ Packers game
"NodakPaul" wrote:
"vikingivan" wrote:
Good teams win despite bad calls.We have had our share of bad calls over the years.
The football gods have not been good to us.
It all started in 1975 with the playoff loss to Dallas.
Why is it that I can remember losing games because of bad officiating, but I cannot recall one single victory where the officials helped us win a game.
Is it selective memory?
Can anyone remember a bad call going against any of our opponents that enabled us to win a game that we should have lost?
Blaming the ref's bad call for us losing the game is a lot like blaming Gary Anderson's missed field goal for us not going to the super bowl in 98.
There were plenty of other things that could have happened in both games that would have rendered both plays moot.
Your first statement is partialy true.
but Gary Anderson missing the FG, did lose that game for us, thats just a plain fact, because I put my foot thru my friends wall when he missed it and I said so then, that we will lose now because of that, which we did..
Bad ref calls can make you lose also, it's a fact that some games are won with that one or two speical plays, just as can be said, one or two bad ref calls against you, espiecaly when they take points off the board, can easily make you lose a game that surely should have been yours.....And I've seen it happen twice this season so far against the Vikings... >

I LOVE THE SMELL OF VICTORY IN THE MORNING AIR.
-
10-12-2007, 09:14 AM #25
Re: Article on officiating in the Vikings/ Packers game
Hopefully these questionable calls start to even out. We need things to balance out. Just would like to see us not be in a posistion for a lousy call to take the game from us. It is a percentage thing and it has to swing our way eventually. It won't be any easier this weekend on the road in Chicago.
-
Re: Article on officiating in the Vikings/ Packers game
"NordicNed" wrote:
I disagree."NodakPaul" wrote:
"vikingivan" wrote:
Good teams win despite bad calls.We have had our share of bad calls over the years.
The football gods have not been good to us.
It all started in 1975 with the playoff loss to Dallas.
Why is it that I can remember losing games because of bad officiating, but I cannot recall one single victory where the officials helped us win a game.
Is it selective memory?
Can anyone remember a bad call going against any of our opponents that enabled us to win a game that we should have lost?
Blaming the ref's bad call for us losing the game is a lot like blaming Gary Anderson's missed field goal for us not going to the super bowl in 98.
There were plenty of other things that could have happened in both games that would have rendered both plays moot.
Your first statement is partialy true.
but Gary Anderson missing the FG, did lose that game for us, thats just a plain fact, because I put my foot thru my friends wall when he missed it and I said so then, that we will lose now because of that, which we did..
Bad ref calls can make you lose also, it's a fact that some games are won with that one or two speical plays, just as can be said, one or two bad ref calls against you, espiecaly when they take points off the board, can easily make you lose a game that surely should have been yours.....And I've seen it happen twice this season so far against the Vikings... >
Green running the clock lost the game for us.
The dropped pass to Moss (which would have been a TD) lost the game for us.
Allowing Atlanta to put together a 71-yard, eight-play drive in overtime lost the game for us.
Just because Anderson would have won the game had he made the FG, doesn't mean that he lost it when he missed.Zeus wrote:
When are you going to realize that picking out the 20 bad throws this year and ignoring the 300 good ones does not make your point?
=Z=
-
Re: Article on officiating in the Vikings/ Packers game
"vikingivan" wrote:
Had we not allowed the 10 points prior to the Hail Mary, it would have been moot."NodakPaul" wrote:
Some good teams win despite bad calls, not all."vikingivan" wrote:
Good teams win despite bad calls.We have had our share of bad calls over the years.
The football gods have not been good to us.
It all started in 1975 with the playoff loss to Dallas.
Why is it that I can remember losing games because of bad officiating, but I cannot recall one single victory where the officials helped us win a game.
Is it selective memory?
Can anyone remember a bad call going against any of our opponents that enabled us to win a game that we should have lost?
Blaming the ref's bad call for us losing the game is a lot like blaming Gary Anderson's missed field goal for us not going to the super bowl in 98.
There were plenty of other things that could have happened in both games that would have rendered both plays moot.
How were we to overcome the terrible call at the end of the Dallas playoff game in 75? I don't blame Gary Anderson for losing that game in 98.
I blame the coaches Billick and Green.
But in the end, that game did not turn on officiating.
The game was decided on the field.
Players and Coaches should win or lose games.
Not officials.
The Cowboys got the ball at their own 15 yard line with less than two minutes left in the game.
Yet the vaunted Purple People Eater defense let Staubach march down the field to the 50 with 24 seconds left on the clock.
Had the defense held, the noncall would have been moot.
Many, many things go into winning or losing a game.
Yes, the call was horse shit.
Yes, it gave Dallas a TD that they didn't earn.
No, it didn't lose the game for us.Zeus wrote:
When are you going to realize that picking out the 20 bad throws this year and ignoring the 300 good ones does not make your point?
=Z=
-
10-12-2007, 10:36 AM #28
Star Spokesman
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 1,993
Re: Article on officiating in the Vikings/ Packers game
"NodakPaul" wrote:
How did that non call not lose the game for us?"vikingivan" wrote:
Had we not allowed the 10 points prior to the Hail Mary, it would have been moot."NodakPaul" wrote:
Some good teams win despite bad calls, not all."vikingivan" wrote:
Good teams win despite bad calls.We have had our share of bad calls over the years.
The football gods have not been good to us.
It all started in 1975 with the playoff loss to Dallas.
Why is it that I can remember losing games because of bad officiating, but I cannot recall one single victory where the officials helped us win a game.
Is it selective memory?
Can anyone remember a bad call going against any of our opponents that enabled us to win a game that we should have lost?
Blaming the ref's bad call for us losing the game is a lot like blaming Gary Anderson's missed field goal for us not going to the super bowl in 98.
There were plenty of other things that could have happened in both games that would have rendered both plays moot.
How were we to overcome the terrible call at the end of the Dallas playoff game in 75? I don't blame Gary Anderson for losing that game in 98.
I blame the coaches Billick and Green.
But in the end, that game did not turn on officiating.
The game was decided on the field.
Players and Coaches should win or lose games.
Not officials.
The Cowboys got the ball at their own 15 yard line with less than two minutes left in the game.
Yet the vaunted Purple People Eater defense let Staubach march down the field to the 50 with 24 seconds left on the clock.
Had the defense held, the noncall would have been moot.
Many, many things go into winning or losing a game.
Yes, the call was horse pooh.
Yes, it gave Dallas a TD that they didn't earn.
No, it didn't lose the game for us.
C'mon Paul.
Without that touchdown the Cowboys would have lost the game.
What do you mean allow 10 points before the hail mary?
Holding the Cowboys led by Roger Staubach to 10 points is pretty impressive.
-
10-12-2007, 11:02 AM #29
Re: Article on officiating in the Vikings/ Packers game
The refs SUCK!!!
I vote instant replay for EVERY PLAY!!!BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE
-
10-12-2007, 11:09 AM #30
Re: Article on officiating in the Vikings/ Packers game
"cajunvike" wrote:
Didn't they replay the non-fumble for Korey Hall? Even replay has its limitations.. plus it sucks to have to still and watch the clown walk into the phone booth.. like it is some national secret taking place in the booth.The refs SUCK!!!
I vote instant replay for EVERY PLAY!!!

Similar Threads
-
Vikings get "flag happy" officiating crew
By TNViking in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 18Last Post: 01-18-2010, 11:19 AM -
Her first Vikings Packers game
By VikingsFan4Lyfe in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 12Last Post: 10-07-2009, 08:42 AM -
Packers Vikings game
By PurplePeopleEaters in forum The ClubhouseReplies: 18Last Post: 11-02-2005, 12:53 AM -
Vikings-Packers Game on DVD
By ChiTownVike in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 15Last Post: 04-05-2005, 02:44 AM -
The Packers @ Vikings Christmas Eve Game
By MossWilliamsHenderson in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 9Last Post: 12-19-2004, 06:05 PM


Reply With Quote






Bookmarks