Thread: Anudder punk Viking hater

It's kinda nice having the whole nfl against us, so we can show them what were made of in the weeks to come!

This guy is just trying to stir up some controversy. Lousy writers do that sometimes because it's the only way people will pay attention to their articles. I'm sure every week he picks on some team, and this week he decided to go against the Vikings.

Guys, you are looking for support in the wrong places. Right now, the VIkes are getting mad love from two of the biggest Chicago Bear fans on TV...Michael Wilbon of PTI and Jay Mariotti of Around the Horn both have the Vikings in the playoffs and have stood by that prediction for several weeks now. So no, we're not a hated team, that's a bunch of crap, people are impressed with how we've been playing, and their giving us a shot....people who say otherwise are in a rapidly shrinking minority.

There has to be at least ONE in every season. One writer who attempts to be avant guarde by bucking the trend and bashing the teams that attempt to climb out of the hole.

Why?

Because if the Vikings slip, this tard gets to shout to the world, "Look h9ow smart I am. I picked it all along!!!". And, if they don't slip and actually make a dent in the post season, This guy simply moves on to the next story.

There is no accountability in sports *cough* journalism. Never has been, never will be. Sports *cough, cough, hack* writers are the worst bunch of bandwagon jumpers in the sports world. While it is true that every once in awhile you find one or two who have that rare combination of intelligence and integrity, most of these sports *cough, cough, hack, wheeeze, vomit* writers don't.

Because they know one thing. The only thing they HAVE to know. No matter what tripe they serve up to the general public, it'll sell, and they'll still have jobs in the morning. No matter how wrong they are, they will still be drawing a check next week. Because no one holds them to their words.

It would be interesting to get a dedicated group of people to spend an entire season collecting the works of individual media morons. Then, as the season progresses, track the changes in stance and opinion...noting how many times they state that it IS a change in opinion. Then, at the end of the season, publish the findings on each media tard...and copy the results to the editors.

If people actually did something like that, and then started complaining to the editors and producers about inaccurate and uninformed *phlem ball* writing, we might...just might...be able to affect a change in media coverage. Less opinion, more fact. At teh very least, it would be fun to know whom to address the hate mail to.

Caine

I hate the media!

It's all about opinions ladies and gentleman. Sports analysis is like the weatherman getting the weather called correctly, go with your best bet...or least..which ever you prefer.

i emailed him and called him a c0.k sucker