-
Re: 10 Vikings with the Most to Prove in 2011
Actually though, I'm forgetting the most obvious choice of player with the most to prove... Christian Ponder.
Time to prove the doubters that he deserved to be picked #12, and time to prove that he doesn't need a Vet to start for a year. If he can do that I'll be ecstatic.
-
07-05-2011, 01:46 PM #22
Re: 10 Vikings with the Most to Prove in 2011
He was the same way in Chicago before we got him. Sometimes make a big play for huge yardage, sometimes drop an easy one set right on him in flight. The Bears weren't too upset about losing him.
Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1100032
Why must you defend everything this FO does....to the point of making your self look like a yes man.
-
07-05-2011, 01:51 PM #23
Re: 10 Vikings with the Most to Prove in 2011
I hear ya, however, as I pointed out, they progressed pretty well why would one not think they would continue to progress?
Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1100028
I think you've missed some things that held him back like injuries were he couldn't have beaten out the likes of Lewis.Stacked position? You call (Hurt)Rice, Harvin, Berrian, Lewis, and even Baskett stacked? He should be able to beat out Lewis and Baskett if he's really as talented as some reports we've been hearing. Unfortunately he got hurt last season, but h e's like Allison. We just need to see some performance, otherwise he'll see the door.
If healthy, I expect JJ will have a good year. If he is battling injuries again, I suspect the team will move on.
LOL, I do remember your impatience with Griff. Rings almost exactly with what your saying about Asher. Just like I kept telling everyone (there were a couple of stuck with Griff) that Griff was coming around. Asher played pretty damn good last year, all things considered.Asher looked average at best, and absolutely awful at worst. He has not done what I expect from a (2nd?) round pick 3 seasons in. He needs to step it up. I'll be pleasantly surprised if he turns out like Griffin, as you might remember me harping on him about this time in his career.
The handfull actually refer back to 2009 were he actually faced some pretty damn good NT's playing in 3-4 defenses.As well as the guy he replaced? You're one of a handful of people who believe that. The others being Sullivan's immediate family. He quite frankly is NOT strong enough to handle some bigger DT/NTs. He gets pushed around, and has not really looked GOOD at any point in his career. He's looked acceptable at times, but never GOOD.
Besides, in the ZB scheme they ran, the C isn't supposed to handle them alone. He is supposed to engage and if the situation dictates, leave that engagement and pull or go to the next level. Hard to do that if your legs are hurt all season.
I'm personnnaly holding Sully's play last year as a gaff because he never really played at 100%. Lets see (if he starts at all) if he can replicate the 2009 performance, again, were he graded out exactly like Birk did.
Money shouldn't make you turn it up. You should have already turned it up. To sit here and think that a player holds back during a game and can turn it up cause he got more money is a bit silly IMHO. Thats like saying he isn't playing at 100%When you get paid the money he just got, I'm expecting he'll turn it up a bit. Now, whether he starts or not remains to be seen, I personally don't think he should. However, with that money, he's going to be our third down specialist, and he'll need to get some good numbers. I'm hoping for a Lance Johnstone-type player.
Game tape is a great equalizer. I think the guys across the line (and their coaches) saw weaknesses in his game that they exploited. Same weaknesses our coaching staff should have fixed.I thought he looked significantly better as a ROok than last year. Not sure what his issue was, but his play went downhill last year. Hopefully it was an undisclosed injury or something that he's overcome, but he NEEDS to step it up.
Again with the money. Who cares. He was signed to run 8 and 9 routes. Injuries to other players asked him to do more. He is one of those cats that can't do more, just like Randy Moss. No one expects him to run a 1 or a 4 route.Regardless, we need to see more from him. With the money given to him, I'd like to see some reliable hands, and the speed we paid for. Now, granted he's been banged up lately, but he needs to come to play. I'm not one of the guys who wants to trade or cut him, he's by far our third-best receiver, but if Rice isn't back, we need to see some Berrian this year.Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.
-
07-05-2011, 01:59 PM #24
Re: 10 Vikings with the Most to Prove in 2011
Haven't heard anybody mention that Singletary may have a lot to prove. He looked pretty good at the beginning with San Fran. Last year they really played below expectations. If he is to ever have another shot at HC in the league, He will have to show he has helped the Vikes next year. In that way he may get offers to be a coordinator somewhere, and begin the climb back up the ladder.
Why must you defend everything this FO does....to the point of making your self look like a yes man.
-
Re: 10 Vikings with the Most to Prove in 2011
Hence the whole 'has something to prove' thing. If he was a proven player, the team would be willing to wait on his injuries.
Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1100036
And yet all players don't work out the same. If Allen turns out like Griff does, great. But since he's not nearly there yet, he has something to prove here.LOL, I do remember your impatience with Griff. Rings almost exactly with what your saying about Asher. Just like I kept telling everyone (there were a couple of stuck with Griff) that Griff was coming around. Asher played pretty damn good last year, all things considered.Asher looked average at best, and absolutely awful at worst. He has not done what I expect from a (2nd?) round pick 3 seasons in. He needs to step it up. I'll be pleasantly surprised if he turns out like Griffin, as you might remember me harping on him about this time in his career.
I disagree. I thought he got tossed around vs. some 3-4 teams and do not think he played well in 09.The handfull actually refer back to 2009 were he actually faced some pretty damn good NT's playing in 3-4 defenses.As well as the guy he replaced? You're one of a handful of people who believe that. The others being Sullivan's immediate family. He quite frankly is NOT strong enough to handle some bigger DT/NTs. He gets pushed around, and has not really looked GOOD at any point in his career. He's looked acceptable at times, but never GOOD.
Again, make all the excuses you want. If he's healthy, he needs to play well.Besides, in the ZB scheme they ran, the C isn't supposed to handle them alone. He is supposed to engage and if the situation dictates, leave that engagement and pull or go to the next level. Hard to do that if your legs are hurt all season.
I'd love to see anyone else agree with your claim that Sully has "graded out exactly like Birk".I'm personnnaly holding Sully's play last year as a gaff because he never really played at 100%. Lets see (if he starts at all) if he can replicate the 2009 performance, again, were he graded out exactly like Birk did.
I never said he holds back. I'm saying the team gave him a pretty damn nice contract, they obviously expect alot from him. He needs to show he was worth that contract.Money shouldn't make you turn it up. You should have already turned it up. To sit here and think that a player holds back during a game and can turn it up cause he got more money is a bit silly IMHO. Thats like saying he isn't playing at 100%When you get paid the money he just got, I'm expecting he'll turn it up a bit. Now, whether he starts or not remains to be seen, I personally don't think he should. However, with that money, he's going to be our third down specialist, and he'll need to get some good numbers. I'm hoping for a Lance Johnstone-type player.
Think whatever you want. He played well his rook eyar, he played poorly last year. That has to change, no ifs, ands or butts about it.Game tape is a great equalizer. I think the guys across the line (and their coaches) saw weaknesses in his game that they exploited. Same weaknesses our coaching staff should have fixed.I thought he looked significantly better as a ROok than last year. Not sure what his issue was, but his play went downhill last year. Hopefully it was an undisclosed injury or something that he's overcome, but he NEEDS to step it up.
Yet, he hasn't hit on many 8 or 9 routes (I know, I know, it was all Favre's fault).Again with the money. Who cares. He was signed to run 8 and 9 routes. Injuries to other players asked him to do more. He is one of those cats that can't do more, just like Randy Moss. No one expects him to run a 1 or a 4 route.Regardless, we need to see more from him. With the money given to him, I'd like to see some reliable hands, and the speed we paid for. Now, granted he's been banged up lately, but he needs to come to play. I'm not one of the guys who wants to trade or cut him, he's by far our third-best receiver, but if Rice isn't back, we need to see some Berrian this year.
Oddly enough, if you go back to 08 with Frerotte, alot of Berrians big plays weren't deep routes, they were slants or outs that he managed to take the distance.
-
07-05-2011, 03:17 PM #26
Re: 10 Vikings with the Most to Prove in 2011
Truth is, all recievers drop the ball at times. Nature of the game.
Originally Posted by "marshallvike" #1100034
I sometimes think that because of the Troy Williamson fiasco, us Vikings fans might be just a bit over sensatised to it.Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.
-
07-05-2011, 07:04 PM #27
Re: 10 Vikings with the Most to Prove in 2011
10 Vikings with the Most to Prove in 2011: #7#7
Tyrell Johnson
Leslie Frazier still seems to have hope for the 4th year player by saying “this is his year. We’re counting on him to have a big year for us and push to be a starter for our football team.” As it stands now Johnson will be headed into 2011 competing with Madieu Williams for the starting Free Safety spot.
Leslie Frazier has made it clear what he expects from Tyrell Johnson now it’s up to him to prove he can deliver in 2011.
Makes one wonder why Leslie is backing the kid so hard.Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.
-
Re: 10 Vikings with the Most to Prove in 2011
I'd love to see Tyrell "get it" and come out and steal Madieu's spot. Tyrell is pretty athletic, but seems to have too many breakdowns. Anything to get M-Will off the field, and if that means sticking Tyrell out there, great, as long as he earns it.
Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1100123

-
07-05-2011, 07:29 PM #29
Re: 10 Vikings with the Most to Prove in 2011
I still say that most of our S issues track back to the front 4. Fix that and guys like Sanford, Tyrell and M-will will be fine for what is asked of them.
Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1100126
Don't fix the front 4 and the S will continue to let us down because we are asking (as we are with our CB's) them to play in a scheme they aren't suited to play in.
In short, the C2 doesn't ask our secondary to be shutdown guys. It asks them to cover a zone and then run to the ball to minimize YAC. Bringing them up into shorter zones or having to cover a zone that isn't theirs cause we are blitzing a LB all the time will be discovered by the O-coord and they will then exploit the secondary which will in turn result in plays were the S is beat cause he is out of position (taking a bad angle) so far even a shutdown guy wouldn't be able to recover.Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.
-
Re: 10 Vikings with the Most to Prove in 2011
Then riddle me this, why is it that Abdullah seems so good?
Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1100132
It's because we're used to seeing such poor performance from our Safeties, that above average play looks incredible.
Using a leage-wide standard, Abdullah played well, but certainly isn't an elite safety by any strech of the imagination. But comparatively, you could not imagine replacing him because thus far he's been the ONLY guy who seems to have figured out the T2 from a safety's perspective on this team.
Similar Threads
-
Minnesota Vikings QB Tarvaris Jackson says he has 'a lot to prove'...
By cogitans in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 19Last Post: 03-08-2008, 08:44 PM -
VIKINGS have a lot to prove
By VikingMike in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 2Last Post: 12-15-2005, 07:33 PM -
Tice, Vikings still have a lot to prove
By singersp in forum Weekly Opponent TalkReplies: 1Last Post: 12-14-2005, 07:46 AM -
Vikings' backups prove they can help team win
By singersp in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 4Last Post: 11-29-2005, 07:46 AM -
Vikings hope to prove Week 1 was 'anomaly'
By singersp in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 3Last Post: 09-18-2005, 08:48 PM




Reply With Quote



Bookmarks