Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 49
  1. #1
    vikingivan is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,993

    0-5 seems like a realistic start

    Colts coming off a loss at the dome on Sunday.
    I don't know how the Vikings can stop Manning and his offensive weapons.
    Add in the fact that Tony Dungy is a far superior coach than Childress and a loss is almost guaranteed.

    Then the Carolina Panthers come to town.
    A team that just won at San Diego.
    Add in the facts that Steve Smith will be returning from suspension and John Fox is a far superior coach than Childress and a loss is almost guaranteed.

    At the Titans.
    They just defeated the Jaguars at home.
    Add in the fact that Jeff Fischer is a far superior coach than Childress and a loss is almost guaranteed.

    At the Saints.
    Reggie Bush and superior coaching once again.

    It is going to be a long disappointing season once again.

  2. #2
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,909

    Re: 0-5 seems like a realistic start

    Screw 0-5, hell I thing 0-16 is fricken realistic as hell especially if our vaunted DL can't get at the QB.
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

  3. #3
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,262

    Re: 0-5 seems like a realistic start

    "Marrdro" wrote:
    Screw 0-5, hell I thing 0-16 is fricken realistic as hell especially if our vaunted DL can't get at the QB.
    They were owned, plain & simple.

    If JA was double teamed another DL should have been able to get pressure. Period!

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  4. #4
    PurpleTide's Avatar
    PurpleTide is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,210

    Re: 0-5 seems like a realistic start

    "Marrdro" wrote:
    Screw 0-5, hell I thing 0-16 is fricken realistic as hell especially if our vaunted DL can't get at the QB.

    Dang Marrdro, I know we are pissed, but the Pack gameplan was to get the ball out early, and it worked. We will get better, just gotta learn from our mistakes, the Pack had some luck, and a official or two in their pocket, so don't throw in the towel just yet my brother. By the way 3-2, is my prediction... Getting a early wake-up just might be what we needed. You can bet some adjustments will be made.

  5. #5
    Purple Floyd's Avatar
    Purple Floyd is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    16,646
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: 0-5 seems like a realistic start

    "singersp" wrote:
    "Marrdro" wrote:
    Screw 0-5, hell I thing 0-16 is fricken realistic as hell especially if our vaunted DL can't get at the QB.
    They were owned, plain & simple.

    If JA was double teamed another DL should have been able to get pressure. Period!
    They left him singled enough of the time and Clifton shut him down. Plain and simple

  6. #6
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,909

    Re: 0-5 seems like a realistic start

    "PurpleTide" wrote:
    "Marrdro" wrote:
    Screw 0-5, hell I thing 0-16 is fricken realistic as hell especially if our vaunted DL can't get at the QB.

    Dang Marrdro, I know we are pissed, but the Pack gameplan was to get the ball out early, and it worked. We will get better, just gotta learn from our mistakes, the Pack had some luck, and a official or two in their pocket, so don't throw in the towel just yet my brother. By the way 3-2, is my prediction... Getting a early wake-up just might be what we needed. You can bet some adjustments will be made.
    I hear ya my friend, however, even though they were to get the ball out early there were at least 5 to 7 times were we should have had a coverage sack were Rodgers couldn't find an open reciever and still no one got near him.

    Hell, take the TD throw for instance. He got through to his 4th read in his progression before he found an open guy and still no one got to him.

    I have some adjustments for ya.......Fire the Chiller, Bevell, and Frazier and then shit can our DL and get us some guys in that can get pressure.
    ;D
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

  7. #7
    pack93z's Avatar
    pack93z is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,465

    Re: 0-5 seems like a realistic start

    "PurpleTide" wrote:
    "Marrdro" wrote:
    Screw 0-5, hell I thing 0-16 is fricken realistic as hell especially if our vaunted DL can't get at the QB.

    Dang Marrdro, I know we are pissed, but the Pack gameplan was to get the ball out early, and it worked. We will get better, just gotta learn from our mistakes, the Pack had some luck, and a official or two in their pocket, so don't throw in the towel just yet my brother. By the way 3-2, is my prediction... Getting a early wake-up just might be what we needed. You can bet some adjustments will be made.
    I disagree with the official part.. that crew was in preseason form, enough bad calls on both sides of the ball. IMO, they were very subpar as a crew.

  8. #8
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,262

    Re: 0-5 seems like a realistic start

    "UffDaVikes" wrote:
    "singersp" wrote:
    "Marrdro" wrote:
    Screw 0-5, hell I thing 0-16 is fricken realistic as hell especially if our vaunted DL can't get at the QB.
    They were owned, plain & simple.

    If JA was double teamed another DL should have been able to get pressure. Period!
    They left him singled enough of the time and Clifton shut him down. Plain and simple
    I know that. I should have said When instead of If. Clifton shut him down last year as well.

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  9. #9
    vikingivan is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,993

    Re: 0-5 seems like a realistic start

    "PurpleTide" wrote:
    "Marrdro" wrote:
    Screw 0-5, hell I thing 0-16 is fricken realistic as hell especially if our vaunted DL can't get at the QB.

    Dang Marrdro, I know we are pissed, but the Pack gameplan was to get the ball out early, and it worked. We will get better, just gotta learn from our mistakes, the Pack had some luck, and a official or two in their pocket, so don't throw in the towel just yet my brother. By the way 3-2, is my prediction... Getting a early wake-up just might be what we needed. You can bet some adjustments will be made.
    It is about time Zygi made some adjustments.
    The first one should be to admit he screwed up and fire Childress now.

  10. #10
    NodakPaul's Avatar
    NodakPaul is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    West Fargo, ND
    Posts
    17,601
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: 0-5 seems like a realistic start

    "pack93z" wrote:
    "PurpleTide" wrote:
    "Marrdro" wrote:
    Screw 0-5, hell I thing 0-16 is fricken realistic as hell especially if our vaunted DL can't get at the QB.

    Dang Marrdro, I know we are pissed, but the Pack gameplan was to get the ball out early, and it worked. We will get better, just gotta learn from our mistakes, the Pack had some luck, and a official or two in their pocket, so don't throw in the towel just yet my brother. By the way 3-2, is my prediction... Getting a early wake-up just might be what we needed. You can bet some adjustments will be made.
    I disagree with the official part.. that crew was in preseason form, enough bad calls on both sides of the ball. IMO, they were very subpar as a crew.
    I agree.
    The officiating was horrible, with both sides getting poor calls.
    Zeus wrote:
    When are you going to realize that picking out the 20 bad throws this year and ignoring the 300 good ones does not make your point?

    =Z=

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Rank From 1-5 Who You Want Us To Draft (Be Realistic)
    By ajoyce in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 02-04-2008, 01:06 PM
  2. Realistic Fight Scene
    By Prophet in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-23-2007, 04:42 PM
  3. Lets be Realistic
    By purpleFavreEaters in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 11-07-2005, 11:51 PM
  4. Lets Be Realistic
    By insomniac in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 03-20-2005, 12:49 AM
  5. Realistic
    By Haneef87 in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 12-18-2004, 02:47 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •