Good Luck BloodyHorns

**ThorSPL** · 12-16-2009, 08:43 AM

BloodyHorns82 wrote:

Congratz on the win Pack. You had the better team and deserved to go on. My only gripe is that I think I should have been seeded higher, but I'm sure there is a method to the madness (head to head instead of overall points)that I'm unaware of.

Regardless, it was a fun season. I'm already looking forward to next year.

Tiebreakers usually go overall record, then head to head.

**Zeus** · 12-16-2009, 08:55 AM

BloodyHorns82 wrote:

Congratz on the win Pack. You had the better team and deserved to go on. My only gripe is that I think I should have been seeded higher, but I'm sure there is a method to the madness (head to head instead of overall points)that I'm unaware of.

I can link you to the thread where I explained the seeding, if you like.

But I'll be nice and explain it here:

SINCE we only play ONE intra-divisional game/season, I chose to seed the top 4 slots to the 4 division winners, with total points scored being the deciding factor in slotting them 1 through 4.

Then the next four seeds (5-8) went to the 2nd-place teams in each division, again using total points scored to seed them.

And so on.

=Z=

**Zeus** · 12-16-2009, 08:57 AM

ThorSPL wrote:

BloodyHorns82 wrote:

Congratz on the win Pack. You had the better team and deserved to go on. My only gripe is that I think I should have been seeded higher, but I'm sure there is a method to the madness (head to head instead of overall points)that I'm unaware of.

Regardless, it was a fun season. I'm already looking forward to next year.

Tiebreakers usually go overall record, then head to head.

Those are the tiebreakers used to determine playoff spots within the 4 divisions. Top 4 teams in each division qualify for the playoffs.

However, as noted above, that is not a fair measure when seeding teams that may have similar players because of the nature of a 48-team league.

=Z=