Will the Colts go 0-16?

**El Vikingo** · 12-02-2011, 06:29 AM

They may go 0-15 and winning the last one vs a washed up Jaguars on the last week when number 1 pick is granted for em

Do you think they are giving their best with Luck on the horizon?

**Reignman** · 12-03-2011, 12:02 AM

They shit on NFL history and their fans in '09. They told the fans protecting their players was more important than 16-0, but then they ran their TE Dallas Clark and WR Reggie Wayne out in a blizzard in the final game in Buffalo so they could each get their 100th reception. Manning also played long enough to throw 18 passes in a BLIZZARD, when they were trying to PROTECT their players.

Football karma made them lose the bowl that year, but I think it's clear it wasn't done teaching them a lesson. You refuse to go 16-0, ok I'll make you go 0-16 muhahaha. I hope they go 0-16, but now with all the talk about Luck, Manning is suddenly healing fast and thinks he's going to comeback and play a couple games this year.

How does that make any sense? Makes sense for Manning sure, if he can win them a couple games he can sabotage the Colts shot at Luck and assure that he finishes his career in Indy. But why would the Colts want to rush him back and risk making his injury worse in a lost season and risk losing the #1 pick, I just don't get this franchise.

**MulletMullitia** · 12-03-2011, 02:45 AM

Take it from an Indianapolis resident. I have seen them play in person 4 times so far this season. It's not that the schedule is hard. They have played plenty of winnable games. It's just not going to happen. No more winnable games on the schedule. This team is MUCH worse than the 0-16 Lions. Even with a healthy Peyton, this team isn't better than 8-8.

**Reignman** · 12-18-2011, 06:12 PM

The answer is no. And now the Vikings are in better position to grab that #1 spot.

**marshallvike** · 12-18-2011, 06:19 PM

Originally Posted by Reignman

The answer is no. And now the Vikings are in better position to grab that #1 spot.

No we're not. Colts will not win another, we will not lose another.

**Reignman** · 12-18-2011, 06:27 PM

You're suffering from some serious denial my friend lol.

**El Vikingo** · 12-19-2011, 01:50 PM

Originally Posted by Reignman

The answer is no. And now the Vikings are in better position to grab that #1 spot.

To be honest craziest things have happened,they got Houston and Jacksonville,they could easily win one ...

There are the Rams too with 2-12 and 2 very possible L in the last 2 weeks

On a 2-14 tie break vs Indy and Rams,anyone knows where wil we be ranked?

**C Mac D** · 12-19-2011, 02:04 PM

Originally Posted by El Vikingo

To be honest craziest things have happened,they got Houston and Jacksonville,they could easily win one ...

There are the Rams too with 2-12 and 2 very possible L in the last 2 weeks

On a 2-14 tie break vs Indy and Rams,anyone knows where wil we be ranked?

We hold the tie-breaker against the Rams thanks to the Bears collapse. I think the Colts still have the #1 pick if we tie with them though... I think. More than likely we'll have the #2 pick.

**Turboe** · 12-19-2011, 02:58 PM

What pick did we give up to bring in McNabb? Just wondering what our full compliment of picks is this year?

**midgensa** · 12-19-2011, 03:29 PM

As of now ... if all three teams end up 2-14 the Colts opponents are (right now) 121-103, the Vikings are 127-97 and the Rams are 131-93. So, we would be picking No. 2. Remember ... all of these teams and their opponents have two games to play, so there could be crazy shifts any week.
We could continue to have a "worse" schedule though if the Bears continue to slide and the Texans win out, that would shift things really close ... of course for the Bears to slide we would have to beat them, and that would throw this all out of whack.
It is possible we can make up that six games difference, but not that likely. So, unless the Colts WIN out, the Vikes appear out of the Andrew Luck sweepstakes.