What City Most Deserves an NFL Team?

**BadlandsVikings** · 10-23-2009, 10:44 PM

What city deserves an NFL team, and how would the divisions be redone?

**i_bleed_purple** · 10-23-2009, 10:52 PM

London should never get a team, It would just be stupid to have to travel 8 hours for a game.
If the NFL will go international, it will go to Canada and Mexico, not the UK.
LA had its chance, twice.

I think Minneapolis deserves an NFL team

**gagarr** · 10-23-2009, 10:57 PM

I wouldn't say LA "deserves" a team, but it would be good for a team and the NFL to be in that huge market.

If the Vikes move to LA, then the Vikes should be put in the NFC West and the Rams moved to the NFCN.
Why?
Because I live in AZ and having the Vikes come over twice a year would save $$ on me going to see them.

**i_bleed_purple** · 10-23-2009, 11:09 PM

"gagarr" wrote:

I wouldn't say LA "deserves" a team, but it would be good for a team and the NFL to be in that huge market.

If the Vikes move to LA, then the Vikes should be put in the NFC West and the Rams moved to the NFCN.
Why?
Because I live in AZ and having the Vikes come over twice a year would save $$ on me going to see them.

St. Louis isn't exactly north.
If there was going to be a switch, Seattle could play in the north and Vikes in the West.

**Marrdro** · 10-24-2009, 12:05 AM

"BadlandsViking" wrote:

What city deserves an NFL team, and how would the divisions be redone?

Were ya been my friend.
You've been missed.
:-*

I went somewhere else.
There are lots of places out there like my good ole Tidewater community that have been toiling for years to get a professional team.
One of them should get rewarded.

**midgensa** · 10-24-2009, 12:06 AM

"i_bleed_purple" wrote:

"gagarr" wrote:

I wouldn't say LA "deserves" a team, but it would be good for a team and the NFL to be in that huge market.

If the Vikes move to LA, then the Vikes should be put in the NFC West and the Rams moved to the NFCN.
Why?
Because I live in AZ and having the Vikes come over twice a year would save $$ on me going to see them.

St. Louis isn't exactly north.
If there was going to be a switch, Seattle could play in the north and Vikes in the West.

They would move St. Louis before Seattle. It is more about Time Zones than location. St. Louis is also closer to Chicago/Detroit/Green Bay than Seattle is.

**gregair13** · 10-24-2009, 02:52 AM

Deserves is the wrong word, but LA.

Or Mexico city.

**Formo** · 10-24-2009, 02:21 PM

I voted Toronto.. Because the options were pretty thin.
lol

**i_bleed_purple** · 10-24-2009, 02:25 PM

"midgensa" wrote:

"i_bleed_purple" wrote:

"gagarr" wrote:

I wouldn't say LA "deserves" a team, but it would be good for a team and the NFL to be in that huge market.

If the Vikes move to LA, then the Vikes should be put in the NFC West and the Rams moved to the NFCN.
Why?
Because I live in AZ and having the Vikes come over twice a year would save $$ on me going to see them.

St. Louis isn't exactly north.
If there was going to be a switch, Seattle could play in the north and Vikes in the West.

They would move St. Louis before Seattle. It is more about Time Zones than location. St. Louis is also closer to Chicago/Detroit/Green Bay than Seattle is.

Detroit is in the Easter time zone.