Thread: TJack Gets Some Numbers

its against San Fran, for pete's sake. But I don't think we are missing anything yet.

Marrdro is creaming his jeans as Jackson rings up 2 TD's in a LOSING effort.

TJ who?

Actually IMHO he would have been just as good of a choice for us at QB than the old f$%k we brought in.

Not to mention the INT and 3 fumbles (2 lost) that he also had today.

Originally Posted by Purple Floyd

TJ who?

Actually IMHO he would have been just as good of a choice for us at QB than the old f$%k we brought in.

Yes yes we get it you hate Mcnabb. *yawn*

Originally Posted by 12purplepride28

Yes yes we get it you hate Mcnabb. *yawn*

And you are happy to have him? Great if you like losing......

Originally Posted by Purple Floyd

And you are happy to have him? Great if you like losing......

Not happy but I'll wait a couple games to start freaking out. I don't expect to do anything this year anyways so having Ponder ride the pine for likely half the season isn't going to hurt him. Mcnabb wasn't good today, but he wasn't awful. His pick was just a great defensive play and he had no time all day. We just lost.

"TJ looks just like he did in MN , he holds the ball to long, stares down his throws, takes sacks when he should run, is not accurate and just flat ass sucks."

-Seahawks forum

caine your hatred for tjack is terrible
seattles line and receiving corp is terrible

yet he played well

mcnabb played terrible your trashing the wrong guy

Originally Posted by kyleburkle

caine your hatred for tjack is terrible
seattles line and receiving corp is terrible

yet he played well

mcnabb played terrible your trashing the wrong guy

TJack played well???? He was just the same player who should not be a starting QB. Look at the hawks forums and the local papers they are not exactly high on him