Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24
  1. #21
    DustinDupont's Avatar
    DustinDupont is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,607

    Re: Which team is the most "lame" going into 2008 ?

    "Marrdro" wrote:
    "DustinDupont" wrote:
    "midgensa" wrote:
    The Ravens have nothing to really get excited about heading into next season. No real QB (even worse off than us) an aging defense that just looked old at times last season, a rook coach ... not a lot of promise in Baltimore having to play the Steelers and Browns twice.

    Very true but they should still have a solid defense
    Not if you look at Total Points, Point Per G, Passing yds per game, .
    ;D

    http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/statis...on=2&year=2007
    Well in fantasy football there solid ;D

  2. #22
    cajunvike's Avatar
    cajunvike is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    32,063

    Re: Which team is the most "lame" going into 2008 ?

    Lamest?
    The Pats...because they kept their cheater coach!
    HA!
    BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE

  3. #23
    midgensa's Avatar
    midgensa is offline Jersey Retired Free Kick Specialist 3 Champion
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,304

    Re: Which team is the most "lame" going into 2008 ?

    "DustinDupont" wrote:
    "Marrdro" wrote:
    "DustinDupont" wrote:
    "midgensa" wrote:
    The Ravens have nothing to really get excited about heading into next season. No real QB (even worse off than us) an aging defense that just looked old at times last season, a rook coach ... not a lot of promise in Baltimore having to play the Steelers and Browns twice.

    Very true but they should still have a solid defense
    Not if you look at Total Points, Point Per G, Passing yds per game, .

    ;D

    http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/statis...on=2&year=2007
    Well in fantasy football there solid ;D
    Lol ... they were not even good in fantasy last season. I don't think they were a top 15 Defense.
    They really looked terrible at times last year.
    22nd in PTs allowed, 16th in INTs, 19th in sacks and they only scored 1 defensive TD. I would not recommend picking them this season either with the AFC North offenses all on their slate twice.

  4. #24
    The Dropper's Avatar
    The Dropper is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Portland, Ore.
    Posts
    2,101

    Re: Which team is the most "lame" going into 2008 ?

    I'm going to have to say the Bears finish in the cellar this year. Their QB's are complete garbage. They have no running game. They have no WR's. On top of that their defense is quickly dwindling in quality and/or star players are griping about money.

    Just doesn't seem like a very good team atmosphere over there. I predict Lame.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. PFT 2008 All-Turd Team
    By Garland Greene in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-30-2008, 11:47 PM
  2. Twins 2008: lifeless, listless, lame (?)
    By StillPurple in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-27-2008, 07:05 PM
  3. Should the Team look for help at WR through FA 2008?
    By Frostbite in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 12-06-2007, 11:30 PM
  4. 2008 Team USA Basketball
    By Ltrey33 in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-07-2006, 05:11 AM
  5. LA team by 2008 ?
    By AngloVike in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-27-2004, 01:37 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •