Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24
  1. #1
    StillPurple is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,255

    Which team is the most "lame" going into 2008 ?

    I was thinking about this tonight, while reading a story about the Redskins having yet another coach. Recall that the Redskins were the team who signed Adam Archuletta to a $ 30
    million contract, and then after that figured out that he didn't fit into their defense at all (does their front office talk to the coaching staff before signing these guys ? Also recall that the Redskins have a shadow head coach, or an "assistant head coach" or whatever they call it).

    Who else do we have:

    - The Raiders - an obvious choice every year since 1990 due to dysfunction from top to bottom. Adding DeAngelo Hall will just add to their "bad attitude" and make them the team most likely to talk hype at you and then get burned by you.

    - Falcons - will start a rookie QB behind a bad, bad line, and Ryan will get killed. The other QB will be in Cell Block D.

    - Miami - celebrated actually winning a game last year.

    - Lions - obvious, no ?
    - Bengals
    - Niners

    Who is it ? I kind of want to go with Oakland, like I do every year, but I think it could be Atlant this year, or maybe Washington.

  2. #2
    dcboardr41 is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,051

    Re: Which team is the most "lame" going into 2008 ?

    "StillPurple" wrote:
    I was thinking about this tonight, while reading a story about the Redskins having yet another coach. Recall that the Redskins were the team who signed Adam Archuletta to a $ 30
    million contract, and then after that figured out that he didn't fit into their defense at all.

    Who else do we have:

    - The Raiders - an obvious choice every year since 1990lame
    - Falcons - will start a rookie QB behind a bad, bad line, and Ryan will get killed. Other QB will be in Cell Block D. not lame, they improved alot through the draft
    - Miami - the Fish can't fill their house, and celebrated actually winning a game last year. not lame, that was last year, the tuna will help them get back to winning this year
    - Lions if they had an Oline they would kinda scare me, not lame
    - Bengalsha, lame, damn thugs
    - Ninersif mike martz helps out alex smith they wont be lame

    Who is it ? I kind of want to go with Oakland, like I do every year, but I think it could be Atlant this year, or maybe Washington.

    Pissing on the Pack since 08'

  3. #3
    StillPurple is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,255

    Re: Which team is the most "lame" going into 2008 ?

    Maybe it should be the "Bungles"...

    Remember when their coach came in and was going to "restore the defense" ?

  4. #4
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,935

    Re: Which team is the most "lame" going into 2008 ?

    "StillPurple" wrote:
    Maybe it should be the "Bungles"...

    Remember when their coach came in and was going to "restore the defense" ?
    One of my best friends (I met him in 86 while stationed in Rota SP) currently works here with me and he is a huge Bengals fan.

    He was so jazzed when Marvin took the job, now he is ready for him to go.
    ;D
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

  5. #5
    DustinDupont's Avatar
    DustinDupont is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,607

    Re: Which team is the most "lame" going into 2008 ?

    Oakland...

  6. #6
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,935

    Re: Which team is the most "lame" going into 2008 ?

    "DustinDupont" wrote:
    Oakland...
    Good one.

    KC has to be right up there as well.
    Those fans are getting ready to experience what we just did for the last 2 years.

    I sure hope they have some optimists on thier fans sites.
    ;D
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

  7. #7
    DustinDupont's Avatar
    DustinDupont is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,607

    Re: Which team is the most "lame" going into 2008 ?

    "Marrdro" wrote:
    "StillPurple" wrote:
    Maybe it should be the "Bungles"...

    Remember when their coach came in and was going to "restore the defense" ?
    One of my best friends (I met him in 86 while stationed in Rota SP) currently works here with me and he is a huge Bengals fan.

    He was so jazzed when Marvin took the job, now he is ready for him to go.
    ;D
    I actually still kinda like Marvin, i think he a pretty good coach... I actually really like how is not backing down to Chad Johnson basically saying that it is his team and he doesnt care how good you are, it is going to be his way not the players way. And i also cant blame him for what his players do off the field.

  8. #8
    gagarr's Avatar
    gagarr is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,411

    Re: Which team is the most "lame" going into 2008 ?

    Year in and year out, the Cardinals can look good on paper... have HIGH hopes.... get lots of people saying this is their year (like last year) and the end result will be another losing season.

    The Cards have been to the playoffs twice in the last 31 years.
    Won 1 playoff game since 1947.
    This team is lame, period.

    Might not be the lamest in the NFL, but I would give the Dolphins and Raiders a better chance at making the playoffs.
    [size=12pt]
    Page 148.5 **Doleman 150.5 **Randle 137.5 **Allen 73+
    [/size]

  9. #9
    StillPurple is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,255

    Re: Which team is the most "lame" going into 2008 ?

    I think Choke-land is the obvious choice.

    We also probably should take the Lions of the board.

  10. #10
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,935

    Re: Which team is the most "lame" going into 2008 ?

    "DustinDupont" wrote:
    "Marrdro" wrote:
    "StillPurple" wrote:
    Maybe it should be the "Bungles"...

    Remember when their coach came in and was going to "restore the defense" ?
    One of my best friends (I met him in 86 while stationed in Rota SP) currently works here with me and he is a huge Bengals fan.

    He was so jazzed when Marvin took the job, now he is ready for him to go.

    ;D
    I actually still kinda like Marvin, i think he a pretty good coach... I actually really like how is not backing down to Chad Johnson basically saying that it is his team and he doesnt care how good you are, it is going to be his way not the players way. And i also cant blame him for what his players do off the field.
    I like him as well, however, if you listen to my friend talk, it appears Marvin pays way to much attention on the Defensive side of the ball and doesn't pay attention to the offensive side.

    He thinks that is why coaches like Leslie failed.
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. PFT 2008 All-Turd Team
    By Garland Greene in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-30-2008, 11:47 PM
  2. Twins 2008: lifeless, listless, lame (?)
    By StillPurple in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-27-2008, 07:05 PM
  3. Should the Team look for help at WR through FA 2008?
    By Frostbite in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 12-06-2007, 11:30 PM
  4. 2008 Team USA Basketball
    By Ltrey33 in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-07-2006, 05:11 AM
  5. LA team by 2008 ?
    By AngloVike in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-27-2004, 01:37 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •