Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    cajunvike's Avatar
    cajunvike is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    32,063

    Schrager STILL has Derrick Harvey at #17...to the Chiefs

    Either lazy on Schrager's part or just a stupid pick after trading away the NFL sack leader.

    http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/8059874/First-round-NFL-mock-draft
    BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE

  2. #2
    HEY's Avatar
    HEY
    HEY is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,196
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Schrager STILL has Derrick Harvey at #17...to the Chiefs

    Actually, I think it's a smart pick by the Chiefs if Harvey is still there.

  3. #3
    DustinDupont's Avatar
    DustinDupont is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,607

    Re: Schrager STILL has Derrick Harvey at #17...to the Chiefs

    They could either go O-line or get Harvey if he is still there.... no too bad IMO

  4. #4
    dcboardr41 is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,051

    Re: Schrager STILL has Derrick Harvey at #17...to the Chiefs

    too bad i heard people talking about them taking him at 5

    Pissing on the Pack since 08'

  5. #5
    NodakPaul's Avatar
    NodakPaul is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    West Fargo, ND
    Posts
    17,601
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Schrager STILL has Derrick Harvey at #17...to the Chiefs

    "HEY" wrote:
    Actually, I think it's a smart pick by the Chiefs if Harvey is still there.
    I agree. To be honest, I expect them to take OL with the #5 if Long and Gholsten are both gone, and then take Harvey or Merling at #17.
    Zeus wrote:
    When are you going to realize that picking out the 20 bad throws this year and ignoring the 300 good ones does not make your point?

    =Z=

  6. #6
    cajunvike's Avatar
    cajunvike is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    32,063

    Re: Schrager STILL has Derrick Harvey at #17...to the Chiefs

    "NodakPaul" wrote:
    "HEY" wrote:
    Actually, I think it's a smart pick by the Chiefs if Harvey is still there.
    I agree. To be honest, I expect them to take OL with the #5 if Long and Gholsten are both gone, and then take Harvey or Merling at #17.
    Yeah, but the mock doesn't have Gholston gone at #5.
    BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE

  7. #7
    NodakPaul's Avatar
    NodakPaul is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    West Fargo, ND
    Posts
    17,601
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Schrager STILL has Derrick Harvey at #17...to the Chiefs

    "cajunvike" wrote:
    "NodakPaul" wrote:
    "HEY" wrote:
    Actually, I think it's a smart pick by the Chiefs if Harvey is still there.
    I agree. To be honest, I expect them to take OL with the #5 if Long and Gholsten are both gone, and then take Harvey or Merling at #17.
    Yeah, but the mock doesn't have Gholston gone at #5.
    True, he has them picking Ryan at #5, which I completely disagree with.
    Zeus wrote:
    When are you going to realize that picking out the 20 bad throws this year and ignoring the 300 good ones does not make your point?

    =Z=

  8. #8
    V-Unit's Avatar
    V-Unit is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,317

    Re: Schrager STILL has Derrick Harvey at #17...to the Chiefs

    "cajunvike" wrote:
    Either lazy on Schrager's part or just a stupid pick after trading away the NFL sack leader.

    http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/8059874/First-round-NFL-mock-draft
    So do you call Troy Williamson at #7 after trading away Moss a stupid pick as well?
    "I hate when threads are destroyed by facts and logic."
    - Prophet


    Thanks Josdin!

  9. #9
    cajunvike's Avatar
    cajunvike is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    32,063

    Re: Schrager STILL has Derrick Harvey at #17...to the Chiefs

    "V" wrote:
    "cajunvike" wrote:
    Either lazy on Schrager's part or just a stupid pick after trading away the NFL sack leader.

    http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/8059874/First-round-NFL-mock-draft
    So do you call Troy Williamson at #7 after trading away Moss a stupid pick as well?
    Uh.....YEAH.

    I wanted Derrick Johnson from Texas at LB at #7...who has turned into a solid NFL LB for the Chiefs.

    And Matt Jones at the spot where the Vikes took Erasmus James...and while Jones hasn't been spectacular, he would at least be on the field and producing.
    PLUS Jones's laid back style would have likely diffused the pressure to replace Moss...something that I think that TWill never got over.
    BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE

  10. #10
    V-Unit's Avatar
    V-Unit is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,317

    Re: Schrager STILL has Derrick Harvey at #17...to the Chiefs

    "cajunvike" wrote:
    "V" wrote:
    "cajunvike" wrote:
    Either lazy on Schrager's part or just a stupid pick after trading away the NFL sack leader.

    http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/8059874/First-round-NFL-mock-draft
    So do you call Troy Williamson at #7 after trading away Moss a stupid pick as well?
    Uh.....YEAH.

    I wanted Derrick Johnson from Texas at LB at #7...who has turned into a solid NFL LB for the Chiefs.

    And Matt Jones at the spot where the Vikes took Erasmus James...and while Jones hasn't been spectacular, he would at least be on the field and producing.
    PLUS Jones's laid back style would have likely diffused the pressure to replace Moss...something that I think that TWill never got over.
    That's great second-guessing Cajun. The fact is that your best shot at replacing a pro bowl player is to draft the same position high.
    "I hate when threads are destroyed by facts and logic."
    - Prophet


    Thanks Josdin!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 20
    Last Post: 08-15-2008, 08:31 AM
  2. Will the Jaguars have trouble signing first-round pick Derrick Harvey?
    By cajunvike in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-31-2008, 04:14 PM
  3. Was dealing for Derrick Harvey worth it for the Jags?
    By cajunvike in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 06-11-2008, 05:37 PM
  4. If our pick comes up at 17 and Matt Ryan and Derrick Harvey are long gone..
    By mewario in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 71
    Last Post: 03-26-2008, 10:12 AM
  5. Do Vikings like Florida’s DE Derrick Harvey?
    By singersp in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 03-20-2008, 08:51 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •