"6-KINGS" wrote:
You guys think that Rice is not good enough to be a 3rd or 4th reciever.
Look how long Walsh was our 4th sometimes 3rd reciever.
I thought he made a fair contribution.

Is Rice worse than Walsh?
Wow I am not sure about that.........
Not to mention what he could bring to the development of younger players.

Would you play Rice over Robinson, Williamson or Taylor? I sure wouldn't at this point in his career.