Peerless Price Released

Del Rio · 08-30-2005, 07:28 PM

Was watching ESPN on lunch and seen BREAKING NEWS Falcons release Peerless Price.

I don't care, but I have never made a thread like this so I figured why not.

Prophet · 08-30-2005, 07:29 PM

Big surprise there, Ron Mexico can't toss the ball anyway. Good career move for Pearless.

**V4L** · 08-30-2005, 07:30 PM

HAHA.. Won't hurt them too much.. He is an ok WR but it's less weapons to worry about in the NFC.. Less targets for Vick, so i'm a little happy about this

**Mr. Purple** · 08-30-2005, 07:44 PM

He didnt produce in atlanta...he was good in buffalo. but for them , they struggle as it is with thier WR's...Idk why they would weakin thier corps...

**josdin00** · 08-30-2005, 07:51 PM

Wow, this will be the 5th post in this thread, and so far nobody has suggested that we pick him up. I'm proud of you all.

**V4L** · 08-30-2005, 07:55 PM

"josdin00" wrote:

Wow, this will be the 5th post in this thread, and so far nobody has suggested that we pick him up. I'm proud of you all.

HAHA its funny how when someone gets released everyone says we should get them.. Yah im surprised no one has said maybe Peerless can revive his career here in Minnesota or something.. I think we are set at WR's though

**josdin00** · 08-30-2005, 07:55 PM

Okay, sarcasm aside, we all know this guy will get another chance somewhere. I wouldn't be suprised if we end up facing him twice this year. The Bears have been trying to determine their #2 WR all preseason, and nobody has performed well enough to win the job. I don't think it's too wild an idea for them to try to pair up Musin and Peerless.

**cajunvike** · 08-30-2005, 08:06 PM

"Del Rio" wrote:

Was watching ESPN on lunch and seen BREAKING NEWS Falcons release Pearless Price.

I don't care, but I have never made a thread like this so I figured why not.

The REAL question is: What does his first name mean? That he is "without pear"?

**ItalianStallion** · 08-30-2005, 08:18 PM

He was a career #2 who tried to be a #1 in Atlanta. I think the reason we don't need him is because we have enough #2 receivers.

**josdin00** · 08-30-2005, 08:38 PM

Yeah, I think we have enough recievers, but its the offseason, and people are bored. I mean, how long can you talk about whether or not we should replace our emergency QB. I figured someone would make the suggestion.