The Pacman Jones Rule is overdue

**Prophet** · 02-27-2007, 03:05 PM

The Pacman Jones Rule is overdue
By Jemele Hill
Page 2

**OchoCinco** · 02-27-2007, 03:09 PM

Amen to that....
time to start cleaning this crap up, and quit making these guys think their untouchable.....

**Zeus** · 02-27-2007, 03:11 PM

"Prophet" wrote:

The Pacman Jones Rule is overdue
By Jemele Hill
Page 2

What a nice little piece of fiction!
I wonder what new kind of student she'll bring to Hogwarts next??

=Z=

**NodakPaul** · 02-27-2007, 03:13 PM

If the NFL patterned a three-strikes code of conduct program after its substance abuse policy, it would be revolutionary, welcome and a perfect way to combat behavior that is truly embarrassing and unruly.

Absolutely!
NFL players are role models whether they want to be or not.
Thugs like Pacman need to be shown the door.

**NodakPaul** · 02-27-2007, 03:14 PM

"Zeus" wrote:

"Prophet" wrote:

The Pacman Jones Rule is overdue
By Jemele Hill
Page 2

What a nice little piece of fiction!
I wonder what new kind of student she'll bring to Hogwarts next??

=Z=

LMAO.
Come one, you have to admit that if the league instituted something along the lines of a "Three convictions and you're out" rule, there would be a major shake up in the ethics of the NFL.

Of course, it would never get past the NFLPA, but I can dream.

**Zeus** · 02-27-2007, 03:14 PM

"NodakPaul" wrote:

If the NFL patterned a three-strikes code of conduct program after its substance abuse policy, it would be revolutionary, welcome and a perfect way to combat behavior that is truly embarrassing and unruly.

Absolutely!
NFL players are role models whether they want to be or not.
Thugs like Pacman need to be shown the door.

It will never happen.
To make any code-of-conduct program policy in the NFL will require it to be written into the CBA.

And there's NO WAY the players would agree to something like this w/out getting concessions from the owners on money, which is something the owners won't do, etc. etc. etc.

=Z=

**Prophet** · 02-27-2007, 03:16 PM

"Zeus" wrote:

"NodakPaul" wrote:

If the NFL patterned a three-strikes code of conduct program after its substance abuse policy, it would be revolutionary, welcome and a perfect way to combat behavior that is truly embarrassing and unruly.

Absolutely!
NFL players are role models whether they want to be or not.
Thugs like Pacman need to be shown the door.

It will never happen.
To make any code-of-conduct program policy in the NFL will require it to be written into the CBA.

And there's NO WAY the players would agree to something like this w/out getting concessions from the owners on money, which is something the owners won't do, etc. etc. etc.

=Z=

There's no way smoking will be banned in public places.

**C-PepNSalt** · 02-27-2007, 03:18 PM

"Prophet" wrote:

"Zeus" wrote:

"NodakPaul" wrote:

If the NFL patterned a three-strikes code of conduct program after its substance abuse policy, it would be revolutionary, welcome and a perfect way to combat behavior that is truly embarrassing and unruly.

Absolutely!
NFL players are role models whether they want to be or not.
Thugs like Pacman need to be shown the door.

It will never happen.
To make any code-of-conduct program policy in the NFL will require it to be written into the CBA.

And there's NO WAY the players would agree to something like this w/out getting concessions from the owners on money, which is something the owners won't do, etc. etc. etc.

=Z=

There's no way smoking will be banned in public places.

Or Entire countries...

**BadlandsVikings** · 02-27-2007, 03:18 PM

Our prisons are overcrowded as it is.
If pro sports leagues had a 3 strikes and you're out rule thre wouldn't be any teams left.

**Zeus** · 02-27-2007, 03:18 PM

"Prophet" wrote:

There's no way smoking will be banned in public places.

*tweet*

[img width=400 height=341]http://blogs.indiewire.com/twhalliii/WCDOR19207042105.jpg[/img]

Yellow Card given for a piss-poor analogy.

As politicians are able to pass legislation with minimal input from their constituency, I don't see how that's relevant to something which must be agreed upon by two parties in a contract negotiation.

=Z=