05-13-2005, 05:35 PM #1
bears and pack COULD add some good vets to their LB's.. I wouldnt like this at all cuz they are both very good..Packers look less likely though
Bears | Simmons Has Good Workout
Terry Bannon, of the Chicago Tribune, reports the
Chicago Bears met with free agent LB Anthony Simmons (Seahawks) Wednesday, May 11, and he had a good workout for the team and could be signed. However, the Bears are still concerned about the broken wrist that ended his 2004 season.
Packers | Unlikely to Pursue Boulware
Pete Dougherty, of PackersNews.com, reports
Green Bay Packers general manager Ted Thompson wouldn't rule out signing free agent LB Peter Boulware (Ravens), but suggested that Boulware's injury history makes it unlikely the team would pursue him. "We're doing some work on him to be sure," Thompson said. "But he's had a tough time with injuries, so you'd have to be really careful on that."
05-13-2005, 05:41 PM #2
I would think that the Pack would be frantically looking for any help they could find.
05-13-2005, 05:43 PM #3
No kidding.. all they have there is Nick Barnett.. It would suck if ther added Boulware
05-13-2005, 05:49 PM #4
eh, let them sign him, he is a situational pass rusher at best in a 4-3
By Caine in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 15Last Post: 12-31-2010, 01:19 AM
By Purple Floyd in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 44Last Post: 09-15-2009, 09:48 PM
By HoosierVike in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 119Last Post: 12-24-2008, 10:05 PM
By MensaTice in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 9Last Post: 01-10-2007, 04:06 AM
By vikings minnesoulija in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 26Last Post: 09-19-2004, 03:35 PM