Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 31
  1. #11
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,266

    Re: Pack signs STUD LB and STUD K...NOT!!!

    "PAvikesfan" wrote:
    so much cap space, so little brains.
    Perhaps we can trade them some draft picks for their 1st one.

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  2. #12
    vikeswin2005's Avatar
    vikeswin2005 is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,641

    Re: Pack signs STUD LB and STUD K...NOT!!!

    hell yeah singer then take aj hawk!!!

  3. #13
    FuadFan's Avatar
    FuadFan is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,746

    Re: Pack signs STUD LB and STUD K...NOT!!!

    Here's another major signing

    Packers | Davenport agrees to terms
    Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:44:26 -0800

    Tom Silverstein, of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, reports the Green Bay Packers have agreed to terms on a new contract with free agent RB Najeh Davenport (Packers). Davenport will sign a one-year contract, his agent, Drew Rosenhaus, said Saturday afternoon, March 25. "Najeh will be in Green Bay Sunday night (March 26) and he'll sign the contract Monday (March 27)," Rosenhaus said. "We had several teams that were interested in him, but he really enjoys playing for the Packers and he wanted it to stay that way. He's very happy to get it squared away. It's good news."

    They now have Green, Gado, and Davenport as RB's I think we're in big trouble now.
    Minnesota Vikings : Simply the best

  4. #14
    whackthepack is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,535

    Re: Pack signs STUD LB and STUD K...NOT!!!

    "FuadFan" wrote:
    Here's another major signing

    Packers | Davenport agrees to terms
    Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:44:26 -0800

    Tom Silverstein, of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, reports the Green Bay Packers have agreed to terms on a new contract with free agent RB Najeh Davenport (Packers). Davenport will sign a one-year contract, his agent, Drew Rosenhaus, said Saturday afternoon, March 25. "Najeh will be in Green Bay Sunday night (March 26) and he'll sign the contract Monday (March 27)," Rosenhaus said. "We had several teams that were interested in him, but he really enjoys playing for the Packers and he wanted it to stay that way. He's very happy to get it squared away. It's good news."

    They now have Green, Gado, and Davenport as RB's I think we're in big trouble now.

    They lost their starting center and best guard, last year they lost 2 guards, who are these guys going to run behind?
    What we've got here is failure to communicate.

  5. #15
    LL-MMan's Avatar
    LL-MMan is offline Starter
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    169

    Re: Pack signs STUD LB and STUD K...NOT!!!

    Woodson's heading to Green Bay next week. I have a feeling he'll end up signing there. The Pack have too much money left over and they're pretty damn stupid.

    Viking fans hunger a Championship more than anyone in sports.

    Bring it home boyz.
    Bring it home.

  6. #16
    rdknieff's Avatar
    rdknieff is offline Starter
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    205

    Re: Pack signs STUD LB and STUD K...NOT!!!

    ya know what? i don't really care if they get woodson..he's WAY overrated.
    ----------------------------------YESSSSS!--------------------------

  7. #17
    LL-MMan's Avatar
    LL-MMan is offline Starter
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    169

    Re: Pack signs STUD LB and STUD K...NOT!!!

    "rdknieff" wrote:
    ya know what? i don't really care if they get woodson..he's WAY overrated.
    agree, I hope they spend bank on em. He's still a good player, but not a top 5 or even top 10 cb any more.

    Viking fans hunger a Championship more than anyone in sports.

    Bring it home boyz.
    Bring it home.

  8. #18
    rdknieff's Avatar
    rdknieff is offline Starter
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    205

    Re: Pack signs STUD LB and STUD K...NOT!!!

    "LL-MMan" wrote:
    "rdknieff" wrote:
    ya know what? i don't really care if they get woodson..he's WAY overrated.

    agree, I hope they spend bank on em.
    He's still a good player, but not a top 5 or even top 10 cb any more.
    You know they'll have to! He's still gonna demand high dough no matter how much he really isn't worth it, I mean....Go Pack! Get that boy while you can! He's REALLY worth it! :lol: :twisted:
    ----------------------------------YESSSSS!--------------------------

  9. #19
    LL-MMan's Avatar
    LL-MMan is offline Starter
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    169

    Re: Pack signs STUD LB and STUD K...NOT!!!

    I know Woodson felt like it was a slap in the face when the Bucs asked him to play Safety. Woodson doesn't want to believe he lost a step. He still thinks he's primetime. He's a joke.

    Viking fans hunger a Championship more than anyone in sports.

    Bring it home boyz.
    Bring it home.

  10. #20
    rdknieff's Avatar
    rdknieff is offline Starter
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    205

    Re: Pack signs STUD LB and STUD K...NOT!!!

    that heisman of his won't help when KoRo zips by him for a TD!
    ----------------------------------YESSSSS!--------------------------

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Maybe a stud TE?
    By Purple in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 10-07-2006, 01:21 PM
  2. Offense better with no stud WR?
    By Garland Greene in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 09-05-2006, 02:40 PM
  3. Look at This 5-STAR STUD MLB in the Draft . . .
    By sleepagent in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 03-27-2006, 07:57 AM
  4. Hey,our new punter is a stud!!
    By Paulbedy59 in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 09-29-2005, 12:42 PM
  5. Vikings sign STUD rb...
    By Phlegm in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-24-2005, 10:54 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •