Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 31
  1. #1
    cajunvike's Avatar
    cajunvike is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    32,063

    Pack signs STUD LB and STUD K...NOT!!!

    :lol: :lol: :lol:

    http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=410791
    BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE

  2. #2
    vikeswin2005's Avatar
    vikeswin2005 is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,641

    Re: Pack signs STUD LB and STUD K...NOT!!!

    man why dont we go get some studs in free agency ....lol

  3. #3
    snowinapril's Avatar
    snowinapril is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    13,404

    Re: Pack signs STUD LB and STUD K...NOT!!!

    Cundiff is not too bad. I think he has concentration problems at times, consistency issues. Yes, it is a downgrade from Longwell.

    I am not familiar with the other dude.

    Cundiff, 6-1 and 218, was waived by the Tampa Bay Buccaneers on Tuesday, perfect timing for the Packers after they were stung by Adam Vinatieri's decision to sign with Indianapolis the same day.
    I found this stung comment very hometown journalistic. It didn't surprise me one bit, if they thought Adam wanted to come to a rebuilding team, they are crazy.

    Indy - Peyton Manning, Dome, and playoff bound
    GB - Favre/Rodgers, Outdoors, and Homeward Bound(wasn't that a movie about dogs)

  4. #4
    Eyedea's Avatar
    Eyedea is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    430

    Re: Pack signs STUD LB and STUD K...NOT!!!

    "snowinapril" wrote:
    Cundiff is not too bad. I think he has concentration problems at times, consistency issues. Yes, it is a downgrade from Longwell.

    I am not familiar with the other dude.

    Cundiff, 6-1 and 218, was waived by the Tampa Bay Buccaneers on Tuesday, perfect timing for the Packers after they were stung by Adam Vinatieri's decision to sign with Indianapolis the same day.
    I found this stung comment very hometown journalistic. It didn't surprise me one bit, if they thought Adam wanted to come to a rebuilding team, they are crazy.

    Indy - Peyton Manning, Dome, and playoff bound
    GB - Favre/Rodgers, Outdoors, and Homeward Bound(wasn't that a movie about dogs)
    yes, I was talking to a Packer fan who said he wasnt really disapointed that they missed out on Adam because will a kicker really make a 4-12 team a playoff team?
    Make love to the present, fuck the past
    --Sage Francis

  5. #5
    MaddenVodkaAddict's Avatar
    MaddenVodkaAddict is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    796

    Re: Pack signs STUD LB and STUD K...NOT!!!

    haha I love the TT quote, "he's a football guy" and the special team's guy's quote, "But he's OK".
    I Love Kerry Collins (and John Rocker).

  6. #6
    viks_fan21's Avatar
    viks_fan21 is offline Asst. Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    644

    Re: Pack signs STUD LB and STUD K...NOT!!!

    What, Ben Taylor's not that bad. I thought he had like 120 tackles playing ILB for the Browns last year. I could be wrong though (and I probably am).

  7. #7
    VikesfaninWis's Avatar
    VikesfaninWis is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    5,055

    Re: Pack signs STUD LB and STUD K...NOT!!!

    That's pretty sad. The Packers had the most cap space in the NFL, and they haven't done a dam thing.. If I were a packer fan (thank god I am not) I would be really pissed.. Why in the hell would Favre even consider coming back after the year he had last season, and now the team is even worse. They lost Longwell, Flanigan, Nall, Walker doesn't want to be there, Grady Jackson is gone. They have a new coach that couldn't even cut it as a OC. Great news for us Viking fans, terrible news for cheeseheads..

  8. #8
    PAvikesfan's Avatar
    PAvikesfan is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,037

    Re: Pack signs STUD LB and STUD K...NOT!!!

    so much cap space, so little brains.

  9. #9
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,262

    Re: Pack signs STUD LB and STUD K...NOT!!!

    Thanx Caj!

    This is my favorie part of the article;

    Coach Mike McCarthy projected Taylor as a strong-side linebacker and said he would have a chance to start. Other than middle linebacker Nick Barnett, the Packers don't have a linebacker whom they can count on
    :evil4:

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  10. #10
    LuckyVike's Avatar
    LuckyVike is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,785

    Re: Pack signs STUD LB and STUD K...NOT!!!

    Checking out Taylor's stats, looks to me like he is a pretty solid LB and they got a good deal on him. He seems more proven than Ben Leber. Atleast he had over 100 TOT tackles...

    Cundiff isn't a bad kicker either...
    The best part of my day is when I get down on my knees, with my head in my hands, and thank GOD for everything he has given me.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Maybe a stud TE?
    By Purple in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 10-07-2006, 01:21 PM
  2. Offense better with no stud WR?
    By Garland Greene in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 09-05-2006, 02:40 PM
  3. Look at This 5-STAR STUD MLB in the Draft . . .
    By sleepagent in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 03-27-2006, 07:57 AM
  4. Hey,our new punter is a stud!!
    By Paulbedy59 in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 09-29-2005, 12:42 PM
  5. Vikings sign STUD rb...
    By Phlegm in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-24-2005, 10:54 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •