Thread: 'One Season' has surgery..
-
01-28-2012, 11:49 AM #11
-
01-28-2012, 12:12 PM #12
-
01-29-2012, 04:43 AM #13
-
01-29-2012, 04:29 PM #14
Starter
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Posts
- 166
AMAZING point! Ever since Rice left, I only hoped that he would go on to have a terribly short and injury filled career. He is incredibly talented, making catches that just don't seem possible (just look at the cowboys playoff game in the '09 season), but he left for a fat paycheck and that pissed me off.
-
01-30-2012, 06:20 AM #15
The Seahawks definitely overpaid & the Viking never would have paid or probably not had to pay that much to resign him. BTW, Aromashodu & Jenkins weren't the original replacement for Rice. Berrian was & we all know how that panned out.
As far as the QB's are concerned, most here claimed Ponder was better than Jackson & a huge improvement the day we drafted him, thus rookie or not should have performed better than Jackson did.
At the end of the day, my point is still valid. We did virtually nothing in FA to improve the WR corp when he left or improve other player positions that had voids. We only continued to plug holes with castaways & practice squad players.
The coaches/owners felt we could win a lot of our games by relying on AD & pounding the ball & getting away with mediocre WR's.
"If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"
-
01-30-2012, 07:44 AM #16
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
- Posts
- 6,146
- Blog Entries
- 12
-
01-30-2012, 11:46 AM #17
Personally I thought the FO made the right decision in not offering Rice that kind of money. I would like to know how hard they tried to keep him though.
As far as his replacements, I don't beleive we really "upgraded", but rather we replaced with some players we were maybe hoping would pan out. Rice had his great year with Favre, but so did all of Favre's receivers.
I really expect our receiving corps to look different this year. We may still not have a true number one, but I think we will be better in that area.
-
Berrian was Rice's replacement? Did they not both play for the Vikings for the last few years? I thought berrian was brought in to replace Troy Williamson and the immortal Bobby Wade lol/
That is bullshit but nice try. The consensus was mixed at best and in no way was he given any more slack than jackson was in his rookie year. And into next year he will be held to the same standard that jackson was- Either improve and get better in what he does or get someone else who will.As far as the QB's are concerned, most here claimed Ponder was better than Jackson & a huge improvement the day we drafted him, thus rookie or not should have performed better than Jackson did.
Nobody argued that. You just got called out for your continued man love for jackson. Don't worry- the pain will ease with time.At the end of the day, my point is still valid. We did virtually nothing in FA to improve the WR corp when he left or improve other player positions that had voids. We only continued to plug holes with castaways & practice squad players.
They also thought they could rely on Johnson instead of McKinney and apparently thought they could replace Madieu with something off the shelf too. The screwed the pooch in pretty much every phase of the organization.The coaches/owners felt we could win a lot of our games by relying on AD & pounding the ball & getting away with mediocre WR's.
-
01-31-2012, 06:44 AM #19
-
01-31-2012, 07:17 AM #20
Yes, Berrian was Rice's replacement for the starting WR role. That's common knowlegde.
Do you want us to believe that Robison wasn't Edwards' replacement too since they were both on the team in 2010?
Sure it was mixed a little, but the majority of the people here believed he was an upgrade over Jackson before he even started. If you got proof stating the majority felt Jackson was better or stated it yourself , I'd like to see it.That is bullshit but nice try. The consensus was mixed at best and in no way was he given any more slack than jackson was in his rookie year. And into next year he will be held to the same standard that jackson was- Either improve and get better in what he does or get someone else who will.
Nice try, but 1. I don't have a man love for Jackson. 2. My comment was about Rice, not Jackson. I brought up Jackson because he was the one throwing to Rice & you made it sound as if our WR's were being thrown to by a POS rookie, while Rice was being thrown to by a star veteran.Nobody argued that. You just got called out for your continued man love for jackson. Don't worry- the pain will ease with time.
Yes they did & I was totally behind the McKinney shit-canning because of his attitude & the terrible physical shape he was in.They also thought they could rely on Johnson instead of McKinney and apparently thought they could replace Madieu with something off the shelf too. The screwed the pooch in pretty much every phase of the organization.
I would have been OK with them not resigning Rice if they had brought in a legitimate replacement during FA, but instead they once again stood by & let them all sign elsewhere, believing all the while that Berrian could be our guy. Your spot on on Madieu as well. Yes he wasn't the best, but they failed to upgrade the position.
Unless I'm missing someone, every new FA they brought in here was a castaway from another team that nobody wanted & was a downgrade over what we had with maybe Sapp as the exception.
Was Spielman making the bulk of these decisions? If so, with him now our GM, we are screwed.
"If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"





Reply With Quote





Bookmarks