Thread: The official Jay Cutler proves nay sayers correct.

By Defeating the Shittiest Team to Ever Make the Playoffs

LINK

Not that I'm saying I'm a Cutler fan but that same "shittiest team ever to make the playoffs" just beat the defending Super Bowl champions the week before in a playoff game.

Originally Posted by "ejmat" #1088215

Not that I'm saying I'm a Cutler fan but that same "shittiest team ever to make the playoffs" just beat the defending Super Bowl champions the week before in a playoff game.

the overachieving pretenders with a terrible D and no run game. The seahawks played the game of their lives that week too.

Cutler is going to get picked tomorrow and I believe more than once. I don't see him beating the Pukers even at Soldier Field.

Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1088218

Originally Posted by "ejmat" #1088215

Not that I'm saying I'm a Cutler fan but that same "shittiest team ever to make the playoffs" just beat the defending Super Bowl champions the week before in a playoff game.

the overachieving pretenders with a terrible D and no run game. The seahawks played the game of their lives that week too.

I agree but it only proves you still have to show up and play. So to give credit where it's due, Cutler played well in his first post season game. Yeah he could have had a pick but he did play well none the less. Just like Seattle played well the week before. They beat a team that was pertty hot going into the playoffs.

Anyone who still believes Cutler isn't gonna be a topflight QB is really missing out on what is going on.

When he was in Denver and had a nice supporting cast, he did good, but that could be attributed to the supporting cast, much like Sanchize did in his first year.

Now we are watching Cutler getting it done with a better OL than he had last year, but still a work in progress and a WR Corps that can be considered below average at best.

Give that kid one more year and a top tier WR like a Vincent Jackson or even a Sidney Rice and the Bores will beat the PUKERS for Div champs, just like they did this year, for many years to come.

What really pisses me off is that we passed on him not only once, but twice and then mix in that we wasted 2 picks, passing on Rodgers as well.

Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1088273

Anyone who still believes Cutler isn't gonna be a topflight QB is really missing out on what is going on.

When he was in Denver and had a nice supporting cast, he did good, but that could be attributed to the supporting cast, much like Sanchize did in his first year.

Now we are watching Cutler getting it done with a better OL than he had last year, but still a work in progress and a WR Corps that can be considered below average at best.

Give that kid one more year and a top tier WR like a Vincent Jackson or even a Sidney Rice and the Bores will beat the PUKERS for Div champs, just like they did this year, for many years to come.

What really pisses me off is that we passed on him not only once, but twice and then mix in that we wasted 2 picks, passing on Rodgers as well.

How exactly did we pass on Cutler twice? We could not have drafted him, he was picked before us as No. 11 in a draft where we picked 17th (Chad Greenway).
The next time he was "available" it was going to cost a quarterback (Kyle Orton) two first round draft picks (one in 2009 and one in 2010) and a third rounder (2009 as well). That is a whole hell-of-a-lot. We would have been giving up Percy Harvin for sure and then what ended up being Chris Cook after a trade. We also would have had to have offered up a player at QB, something we did not have that anyone was interested in.
I personally wanted to go after Cutler, he is young and has many good years left, but that deal was damn near impossible for any team to pull off except the Bears. And trust me, everyone in D.C. knows it, because the Skins had the deal pretty much DONE before the Bears went ape shit. I would have been willing to give up those two first round picks for him ... but that was a steep price ... and we would at least be one Percy Harvin short.
So ... point is ... we only had ONE shot at Cutler not TWO ... and we would have had to give the farm for him.
As for Rodgers ... when did we pass on him? In the 2005 draft? C'mon. Are we just going to go back and look at every good player that we didn't draft? There was NO chance the Vikes were looking QB that year. We had a three time Pro Bowler who was coming off a 39 TD and 4700 yard season, 2nd in the MVP voting and only 27 years old.
I guess we were idiots for passing on Brady all those times too!
That does not make us idiots. We passed on Rodgers because it was not a team need at the time, and because he was falling like a rock in the draft, EVERYONE pretty much passed on him. The Packers did not draft him thinking he was a star. They just started drafting a boatload of QBs (four in four years between 2005-2008) to make sure they were covered at QB. It worked and they obviously hit jackpot.
But to act like the Vikes were idiots for "passing" on Rodgers when they had a 4700 yard, 39 TD, 2nd in the MVP voting QB returning is ridiculous.

Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1088273

Anyone who still believes Cutler isn't gonna be a topflight QB is really missing out on what is going on.

Now we are watching Cutler getting it done with a better OL than he had last year, but still a work in progress and a WR Corps that can be considered below average at best.

Funny that with Tice arriving at Chicago

Originally Posted by "Marrdro" #1088273

Anyone who still believes Cutler isn't gonna be a topflight QB is really missing out on what is going on....

I'm not missing what's going on and I still say that Cutler is a pansy-ass. He is the latest version of She-lie Manning. A whining little pussy that will never be a topflight QB in the league. Serviceable. Nothing more.

:woohoo: "I wish I could fly so I could be a top flight QB" :woohoo:

Soaring or is it sorrying a 31.8 QB rating inch: