Another guy that could have helped us:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2798876
Printable View
Another guy that could have helped us:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2798876
I dont think I would want any o-lineman that has played for Houston.
Plus, I think we're more interested in Mulitalo.
Cajun, why would we pick up someone who could help us?
I actually don't think he would have helped all that much.
He hasn't played in 18 months, and when he did he wasn't much better than Johnson or Cook...
"aceclown" wrote:
Mulitalo might be too expensive for us!Quote:
I dont think I would want any o-lineman that has played for Houston.
Plus, I think we're more interested in Mulitalo.
"Mr" wrote:
Ummmm, ........... to help, maybe ?Quote:
Cajun, why would we pick up someone who could help us?
The Vikings will likely opt for a younger free agent OL, or draft one in rd 3.
I think Mulitalo is over 30, but he may still be playing effectively, and might be a big upgrade over Hicks.
That would buy the Vikings a few years time to find / develop a long term solution at RG.
Wasn't he the guy that cried in practice?
Whew,
Thought I was gonna see something on Bryant McKinney
:o
"Marrdro" wrote:
That was the intent.Quote:
Whew,
Thought I was gonna see something on Bryant McKinney
:o
"Purplexing" wrote:
:oQuote:
"Mr" wrote:
Ummmm, ........... to help, maybe ?Quote:
Cajun, why would we pick up someone who could help us?
The Vikings will likely opt for a younger free agent OL, or draft one in rd 3.
I think Mulitalo is over 30, but he may still be playing effectively, and might be a big upgrade over Hicks.
That would buy the Vikings a few years time to find / develop a long term solution at RG.