Page 11 of 18 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 177
  1. #101
    C Mac D's Avatar
    C Mac D is offline Posting to P'own
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    13,530

    Re: Matt Walsh tapes released - and there is pretty much nothing in them...

    "vikinggreg" wrote:
    "C" wrote:
    "vikinggreg" wrote:
    After seeing the footage, former Cowboys and Dolphins coach Jimmy Johnson - who works as a host on Fox's pregame show - said on the show: "This is exactly how I was told to do it 18 years ago by a Kansas City Chiefs scout. I tried it, but I didn't think it helped us."
    Jimmy was taping too
    Johnson is notoriously good friends with Belichik and has been standing up for him from the start... he's just being a friend and trying to brush it under the rug...

    What I really love is how all the tapes are from REGULAR SEASON games only... There was a Super Bowl tape, but I guarantee that it was part of the agreement that the SB tape was immediately destroyed.

    Wonder... why would a team named the "Patriots" win 3-out of-4 of the first four post 9-11 Super Bowls? After winning Zero before that? Ever wonder why it was the FIRST GAME BACK after 9/11 that Brady took over for Bledsoe? Ever wonder why the NFL is covering up for the Patriots?

    Simply honest questions that everyone should think about.
    And the only team to beat the Patriots in the Super Bowl was from New York....hmmmm

    How do the Colts fit into this conspiracy ???
    You think that because a different team won a SB (you could also mention TB... considering that's the one in the middle of the Pat's SBs)... that diminishes the theory at all? It's simple thought processes like that which allow these things to happen.
    Disclaimer: I'm an idiot.

  2. #102
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,271

    Re: Matt Walsh tapes released - and there is pretty much nothing in them...

    "NodakPaul" wrote:
    "cajunvike" wrote:
    "NodakPaul" wrote:
    Offensive signals turn out to be no new evidence.

    http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/10/last-word-on-offensive-signals/
    Presumably, the tape created by Walsh shows the hand signals made by offensive coaches to alert the players on the field, and on the sidelines, to the personnel groupings that would be used, such as two running backs, one tight end, and two wideouts, or two tight ends, one running back, and two receivers.

    ...

    So there’s really nothing to it.
    And, as others have pointed out, the rule that the Pats broke relates to taping generally, not to the taping of offensive or defensive signals.

    Thus, the presence of one tape with “offensive signals” doesn’t constitute the kind of new evidence that will land the team or coach Bill Belichick in a fresh vat of boiling water.
    Florio is a
    HUGE Putzie bandwagoner...his column has NO credibility on this issue...even though he attempts to pretend that he is being fair and balanced by throwing in a zinger or two dissing the Putzies.
    I would say that any bias he has toward the Pats is countered by, and has as much credibility, as your sheer hatred for them, at least in this forum.
    And I would say any sheer hatred Cajun has against the Putzies in this forum, is countered by your sheer love for them. LOL

    :P

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  3. #103
    cajunvike's Avatar
    cajunvike is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    32,063

    Re: Matt Walsh tapes released - and there is pretty much nothing in them...

    "singersp" wrote:
    "NodakPaul" wrote:
    "cajunvike" wrote:
    "NodakPaul" wrote:
    Offensive signals turn out to be no new evidence.

    http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/10/last-word-on-offensive-signals/
    Presumably, the tape created by Walsh shows the hand signals made by offensive coaches to alert the players on the field, and on the sidelines, to the personnel groupings that would be used, such as two running backs, one tight end, and two wideouts, or two tight ends, one running back, and two receivers.

    ...

    So there’s really nothing to it.
    And, as others have pointed out, the rule that the Pats broke relates to taping generally, not to the taping of offensive or defensive signals.

    Thus, the presence of one tape with “offensive signals” doesn’t constitute the kind of new evidence that will land the team or coach Bill Belichick in a fresh vat of boiling water.
    Florio is a
    HUGE Putzie bandwagoner...his column has NO credibility on this issue...even though he attempts to pretend that he is being fair and balanced by throwing in a zinger or two dissing the Putzies.
    I would say that any bias he has toward the Pats is countered by, and has as much credibility, as your sheer hatred for them, at least in this forum.
    And I would say any sheer hatred Cajun has against the Putzies in this forum, is countered by your sheer love for them. LOL

    :P
    Really and truly though, how is it any different than posters on here who hate the Pukers with a passion?
    BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE

  4. #104
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,271

    Re: Matt Walsh tapes released - and there is pretty much nothing in them...

    [size=13pt]Tale of the tape, revisited[/size]

    Missteps on clarity kept confusion alive

    By Mike Reiss
    Globe Staff
    boston.com


    May 11, 2008



    How did we get here?


    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  5. #105
    NodakPaul's Avatar
    NodakPaul is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    West Fargo, ND
    Posts
    17,604
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Matt Walsh tapes released - and there is pretty much nothing in them...

    "singersp" wrote:
    "NodakPaul" wrote:
    "cajunvike" wrote:
    "NodakPaul" wrote:
    Offensive signals turn out to be no new evidence.

    http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/10/last-word-on-offensive-signals/
    Presumably, the tape created by Walsh shows the hand signals made by offensive coaches to alert the players on the field, and on the sidelines, to the personnel groupings that would be used, such as two running backs, one tight end, and two wideouts, or two tight ends, one running back, and two receivers.

    ...

    So there’s really nothing to it.
    And, as others have pointed out, the rule that the Pats broke relates to taping generally, not to the taping of offensive or defensive signals.

    Thus, the presence of one tape with “offensive signals” doesn’t constitute the kind of new evidence that will land the team or coach Bill Belichick in a fresh vat of boiling water.
    Florio is a
    HUGE Putzie bandwagoner...his column has NO credibility on this issue...even though he attempts to pretend that he is being fair and balanced by throwing in a zinger or two dissing the Putzies.
    I would say that any bias he has toward the Pats is countered by, and has as much credibility, as your sheer hatred for them, at least in this forum.
    And I would say any sheer hatred Cajun has against the Putzies in this forum, is countered by your sheer love for them. LOL

    :P
    Nope.
    Can't stand the Pats personally.
    I just don't let that cloud my judgment...
    Zeus wrote:
    When are you going to realize that picking out the 20 bad throws this year and ignoring the 300 good ones does not make your point?

    =Z=

  6. #106
    NodakPaul's Avatar
    NodakPaul is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    West Fargo, ND
    Posts
    17,604
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Matt Walsh tapes released - and there is pretty much nothing in them...

    "C" wrote:
    "vikinggreg" wrote:
    "C" wrote:
    "vikinggreg" wrote:
    After seeing the footage, former Cowboys and Dolphins coach Jimmy Johnson - who works as a host on Fox's pregame show - said on the show: "This is exactly how I was told to do it 18 years ago by a Kansas City Chiefs scout. I tried it, but I didn't think it helped us."
    Jimmy was taping too
    Johnson is notoriously good friends with Belichik and has been standing up for him from the start... he's just being a friend and trying to brush it under the rug...

    What I really love is how all the tapes are from REGULAR SEASON games only... There was a Super Bowl tape, but I guarantee that it was part of the agreement that the SB tape was immediately destroyed.

    Wonder... why would a team named the "Patriots" win 3-out of-4 of the first four post 9-11 Super Bowls? After winning Zero before that? Ever wonder why it was the FIRST GAME BACK after 9/11 that Brady took over for Bledsoe? Ever wonder why the NFL is covering up for the Patriots?

    Simply honest questions that everyone should think about.
    And the only team to beat the Patriots in the Super Bowl was from New York....hmmmm

    How do the Colts fit into this conspiracy ???
    You think that because a different team won a SB (you could also mention TB... considering that's the one in the middle of the Pat's SBs)... that diminishes the theory at all? It's simple thought processes like that which allow these things to happen.
    I don't even know where to begin...
    Zeus wrote:
    When are you going to realize that picking out the 20 bad throws this year and ignoring the 300 good ones does not make your point?

    =Z=

  7. #107
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,271

    Re: Matt Walsh tapes released - and there is pretty much nothing in them...

    "NodakPaul" wrote:
    "C" wrote:
    "vikinggreg" wrote:
    "C" wrote:
    "vikinggreg" wrote:
    After seeing the footage, former Cowboys and Dolphins coach Jimmy Johnson - who works as a host on Fox's pregame show - said on the show: "This is exactly how I was told to do it 18 years ago by a Kansas City Chiefs scout. I tried it, but I didn't think it helped us."
    Jimmy was taping too
    Johnson is notoriously good friends with Belichik and has been standing up for him from the start... he's just being a friend and trying to brush it under the rug...

    What I really love is how all the tapes are from REGULAR SEASON games only... There was a Super Bowl tape, but I guarantee that it was part of the agreement that the SB tape was immediately destroyed.

    Wonder... why would a team named the "Patriots" win 3-out of-4 of the first four post 9-11 Super Bowls? After winning Zero before that? Ever wonder why it was the FIRST GAME BACK after 9/11 that Brady took over for Bledsoe? Ever wonder why the NFL is covering up for the Patriots?

    Simply honest questions that everyone should think about.
    And the only team to beat the Patriots in the Super Bowl was from New York....hmmmm

    How do the Colts fit into this conspiracy ???
    You think that because a different team won a SB (you could also mention TB... considering that's the one in the middle of the Pat's SBs)... that diminishes the theory at all? It's simple thought processes like that which allow these things to happen.
    I don't even know where to begin...
    LOL! I wouldn't even touch that one. Since Wilf is from NY, I'm surprised they didn't weave him & the Vikings into it some how.

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  8. #108
    seaniemck7's Avatar
    seaniemck7 is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Virginia Beach, VA
    Posts
    1,453

    Re: Matt Walsh tapes released - and there is pretty much nothing in them...

    "singersp" wrote:
    "NodakPaul" wrote:
    "C" wrote:
    "vikinggreg" wrote:
    "C" wrote:
    [quote author=vikinggreg link=topic=44796.msg777957#msg777957 date=1210620830]
    After seeing the footage, former Cowboys and Dolphins coach Jimmy Johnson - who works as a host on Fox's pregame show - said on the show: "This is exactly how I was told to do it 18 years ago by a Kansas City Chiefs scout. I tried it, but I didn't think it helped us."
    Jimmy was taping too
    Johnson is notoriously good friends with Belichik and has been standing up for him from the start... he's just being a friend and trying to brush it under the rug...

    What I really love is how all the tapes are from REGULAR SEASON games only... There was a Super Bowl tape, but I guarantee that it was part of the agreement that the SB tape was immediately destroyed.

    Wonder... why would a team named the "Patriots" win 3-out of-4 of the first four post 9-11 Super Bowls? After winning Zero before that? Ever wonder why it was the FIRST GAME BACK after 9/11 that Brady took over for Bledsoe? Ever wonder why the NFL is covering up for the Patriots?

    Simply honest questions that everyone should think about.
    And the only team to beat the Patriots in the Super Bowl was from New York....hmmmm

    How do the Colts fit into this conspiracy ???
    You think that because a different team won a SB (you could also mention TB... considering that's the one in the middle of the Pat's SBs)... that diminishes the theory at all? It's simple thought processes like that which allow these things to happen.
    I don't even know where to begin...
    LOL! I wouldn't even touch that one. Since Wilf is from NY, I'm surprised they didn't weave him & the Vikings into it some how.
    [/quote]

    LOL, On this one, I think I'll take the blue pill.

  9. #109
    Purple Floyd's Avatar
    Purple Floyd is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    16,646
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Matt Walsh tapes released - and there is pretty much nothing in them...

    http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/24584682/

    Walsh tapes show no rules violations by Pats


    No, the most scandalous tidbit that emerged Tuesday after Walsh spent more than six hours meeting separately with NFL commissioner Roger Goodell and Sen. Arlen Specter? A snippet of tape that showed not football but close-ups of San Diego Chargers cheerleaders performing during a 2002 game.





    Those BASTARDS!

    ;D

  10. #110
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,271

    Re: Matt Walsh tapes released - and there is pretty much nothing in them...

    "UffDaVikes" wrote:
    http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/24584682/

    Walsh tapes show no rules violations by Pats


    No, the most scandalous tidbit that emerged Tuesday after Walsh spent more than six hours meeting separately with NFL commissioner Roger Goodell and Sen. Arlen Specter? A snippet of tape that showed not football but close-ups of San Diego Chargers cheerleaders performing during a 2002 game.

    Those BASTARDS!

    ;D
    BRILLIANT!

    Those Chargers coaches are smarter than we thought. Use the cheerleaders to send in the signals & no one would be the wiser.

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

Page 11 of 18 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Ex-Patriot Walsh asks for protection to release Spygate tapes
    By singersp in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 03-10-2008, 05:56 AM
  2. Replies: 119
    Last Post: 03-02-2008, 02:26 PM
  3. September Tapes
    By michaelmazid in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-16-2005, 02:03 AM
  4. Game tapes
    By AngloVike in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-09-2003, 07:26 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •