Thread: KGB may not play in opener

Awwwww, that's just too bad.
:'(
NOT!

http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080826/PKR01/80826174/1058/PKR01

I would rather have him play. He would give a good indication of how well the blocking on our left side is going to be in passing situations.

"UffDaVikes" wrote:

I would rather have him play. He would give a good indication of how well the blocking on our left side is going to be in passing situations.

I would rather win the game.

"cajunvike" wrote:

"UffDaVikes" wrote:

I would rather have him play. He would give a good indication of how well the blocking on our left side is going to be in passing situations.

I would rather win the game.

Me too. But with him playing. If we are not good enough to beat them with him on the field it won't say much for our ability to beat any number of teams this year.

"UffDaVikes" wrote:

I would rather have him play. He would give a good indication of how well the blocking on our left side is going to be in passing situations.

if there's a chance that McKinnie is playing in that game then I'd rather KGB wasn't there thank you very much. That way our left side might just prevent the QB getting killed.

I'd rather have him play.
It's always the no-name packers that we overlook that kill us in the end.
If he is out i'm sure our coaching stall will just toss out any worry of them getting a pass-rush from that side.

"UffDaVikes" wrote:

"cajunvike" wrote:

"UffDaVikes" wrote:

I would rather have him play. He would give a good indication of how well the blocking on our left side is going to be in passing situations.

I would rather win the game.

Me too. But with him playing. If we are not good enough to beat them with him on the field it won't say much for our ability to beat any number of teams this year.

Injuries are a part of the game...I'll take them, along with any advantage that they bring, on the other side any day of the week.
Plenty of time to find out if the Vikings can beat other teams in those games.

"AngloVike" wrote:

"UffDaVikes" wrote:

I would rather have him play. He would give a good indication of how well the blocking on our left side is going to be in passing situations.

if there's a chance that McKinnie is playing in that game then I'd rather KGB wasn't there thank you very much. That way our left side might just prevent the QB getting killed.

I thought KGB was the LDE, meanign he will be going up against Cook.
I could be wrong...

"NodakPaul" wrote:

"AngloVike" wrote:

"UffDaVikes" wrote:

I would rather have him play. He would give a good indication of how well the blocking on our left side is going to be in passing situations.

if there's a chance that McKinnie is playing in that game then I'd rather KGB wasn't there thank you very much. That way our left side might just prevent the QB getting killed.

I thought KGB was the LDE, meanign he will be going up against Cook.
I could be wrong...

Nope Kampman plays on the left.

Good. I hope petyon sits in week 2 as well