01-09-2013, 10:00 PM #11Asst. Coach
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
I agree with what most have already posted. I wouldn't mind seeing Freeman brought in because at the very least we'd have a pretty good backup no matter who won the job. Not that there would be a competition because Frazier already named Ponder the starter for next year. However I could see him being on a much shorter leash with a guy like Freeman on the bench. And if Ponder is too fragile to handle that kind of pressure than all the more reason to move on.
01-10-2013, 02:43 PM #12
The bigger question is to what end? So that we could have another QB ready to go if something were to go amiss with Ponder?
Lets not forget, Ponder and Freeman are two different types of QB. One is more inline with a Vertical passing attack (Freeman) and one is for a more traditional dink dunk if you will attack (Ponder).
Having said that......
And don't you think it would be a huge mistake to go into another season without a viable backup plan? Not only are people still divided over the "is he the answer" debate, but now his toughness and the durability of his throwing arm are questionable. After what we've seen the past 2 seasons are you really willing to waste one more full year on Ponder without a backup plan? Good teams stay good because they plan ahead.
Your right, good teams stay good because they plan ahead. Freeman sounds like a plan B behind a plan A.
About the closest thing to this going on is the 49rs and what they've done with Smith and Colin. Only issue there is they had Smith trying to run the vertical attack, with some success, but not enough, which forced their hand early. I'm not so sure that our coaching staff is good enough to pull that off or that we could make Freeman fit into our scheme. It isn't like he's the most accurate thrower in the world. I'd hate to see him trying to complete passes to Percy in all that traffic at his current rate of about 50% and we surely don't have the WR's to run a vertical passing attack so that we could switch over to him seamlessly.Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.
01-10-2013, 04:54 PM #13
01-11-2013, 08:52 PM #14
Well Ponder and Freeman are indeed two types of passers. And that if Freeman were to come to the Vikings, he would not mind sitting on the bench. As he seems to be a team player type of guy. Unlike other QBs who want to start right then and now!NFL 2013 is Here!
01-12-2013, 02:20 AM #15Asst. Coach
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
I understand Frazier wants to appear loyal and all that jazz, but sometimes you limit your own options with such premature decisions. How do you expect to lure in a viable plan B if you tell them flat out they'll be riding the pine behind a guy who basically still has the training wheels on?
01-12-2013, 10:24 AM #16
01-12-2013, 10:59 AM #17
In the 11-20 yard range, he's at 44% to Ponder's 45%.
In the 21-30 yard range, he's at 43% to Ponder's 19%.
In the 31-40 yard range, he's at 33% to Ponder's 0% in 8 tries.
We may not have had a vertical passing attack due to the WR corp we had last year, but we aren't talking about adding Freeman for last year. We are talking about next year & with Wright getting more play time & the Vikings adding a vertical threat WR, that puts Ponder at the disadvantage, not Freeman.
Last edited by singersp; 01-12-2013 at 11:02 AM.
"If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"
01-12-2013, 08:29 PM #18
There's absolutely no chance Freeman would not start if he came to the Vikings.Skol Vikings! Go Cubs!
X MARKS THE SPOT
01-12-2013, 09:31 PM #19
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Blog Entries