.
[youtube=425,350]dUjWKopTN08[/youtube]
Cardinals: Holmes got his feet down
http://blogs.mcall.com/sports/2009/02/
Printable View
.
[youtube=425,350]dUjWKopTN08[/youtube]
Cardinals: Holmes got his feet down
http://blogs.mcall.com/sports/2009/02/
He was in
Ned, I want to see your picture that says otherwise
In..
He was out ...... one replay showed his feet slightly crossed and the right foot never touched down in the field of play .... that would make it no catch I believe ..... I will have to find the clip that showed it pretty clearly.
In without question.
[img width=450 height=335]http://d.yimg.com/a/p/sp/getty/d7/fullj.b9cbb156104bfc32444559cb0d8610c7/b9cbb156104bfc32444559cb0d8610c7-getty-80670228zz293_super_bowl_xl.jpg[/img]
http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/2...qqqefV3OGq3A--
[img width=450 height=275]http://d.yimg.com/a/p/sp/getty/98/fullj.3917e638fc175409ec80eaf28e85ac44/3917e638fc175409ec80eaf28e85ac44-getty-80670228zz305_super_bowl_xl.jpg[/img]
Both feet were clearly down in bounds.
Holmes didn't even need a stupid rule to save his team
;)
http://images.usatoday.com/sports/nf...side-poole.jpg
In... end of discussion.
Seriously, that was a great catch and if you are saying he is out you are in denial and obviously just upset that the underdog got thumped.
"NodakPaul" wrote:
Quote:
In without question.
[img width=450 height=335]http://d.yimg.com/a/p/sp/getty/d7/fullj.b9cbb156104bfc32444559cb0d8610c7/b9cbb156104bfc32444559cb0d8610c7-getty-80670228zz293_super_bowl_xl.jpg[/img]
this picture is a bad example as he doesn't have the ball
;)
There's absolutely no doubt in my mind he was in.
And that's me talking.
"thorshammer" wrote:
Why don't you look at the photos posted in this thread.Quote:
He was out ...... one replay showed his feet slightly crossed and the right foot never touched down in the field of play .... that would make it no catch I believe ..... I will have to find the clip that showed it pretty clearly.
And maybe get some glasses too.
:D