Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 55
  1. #11
    C Mac D's Avatar
    C Mac D is offline Posting to P'own
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    13,533

    Re: Have we seen the end of the New England dynasty?

    "gagarr" wrote:
    Ya'll can talk about Moss, Brady, Welker, etc.

    The the NE dynasty is dependant on Belichick, when he goes so goes the dynasty.
    Because there are lots of players that go there to play for Belichick.

    Also, Belichick likes to cheat, which always helps a dynasty
    ;D
    Belichik is the dynasty, eh? So... what happened in Cleveland?

    Don't you think he inherited a pretty good team from the Tuna in the Patriots?

    How many Super Bowls have they won since they've been PROVEN cheating?

    Yeah... seems like it's more the camcorders than it is Belichik.
    Disclaimer: I'm an idiot.

  2. #12
    i_bleed_purple's Avatar
    i_bleed_purple is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canadialand
    Posts
    16,778
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Have we seen the end of the New England dynasty?

    "C" wrote:
    "gagarr" wrote:
    Ya'll can talk about Moss, Brady, Welker, etc.

    The the NE dynasty is dependant on Belichick, when he goes so goes the dynasty.
    Because there are lots of players that go there to play for Belichick.

    Also, Belichick likes to cheat, which always helps a dynasty
    ;D
    Belichik is the dynasty, eh? So... what happened in Cleveland?

    Don't you think he inherited a pretty good team from the Tuna in the Patriots?

    How many Super Bowls have they won since they've been PROVEN cheating?

    Yeah... seems like it's more the camcorders than it is Belichik.
    keep telling yourself that he's the only coach that has ever done that.

    They went 16-0 the year after being caught cheating, they lost ONE game all year, and as the saying goes "any given sunday..."
    in that case, they got upset.
    they played rather well despite losing their franchise QB last season (all while not being able to "cheat")
    They've had a revolving door at most positions, and still stayed competitive.
    As much as I dislike them, They were a great franchise.
    i'm not so ignorant as to deny that.

  3. #13
    Yfz01 is offline Asst. Coach
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    606

    Re: Have we seen the end of the New England dynasty?

    "i_bleed_purple" wrote:
    "C" wrote:
    "gagarr" wrote:
    Ya'll can talk about Moss, Brady, Welker, etc.

    The the NE dynasty is dependant on Belichick, when he goes so goes the dynasty.
    Because there are lots of players that go there to play for Belichick.

    Also, Belichick likes to cheat, which always helps a dynasty
    ;D
    Belichik is the dynasty, eh? So... what happened in Cleveland?

    Don't you think he inherited a pretty good team from the Tuna in the Patriots?

    How many Super Bowls have they won since they've been PROVEN cheating?

    Yeah... seems like it's more the camcorders than it is Belichik.
    keep telling yourself that he's the only coach that has ever done that.

    They went 16-0 the year after being caught cheating, they lost ONE game all year, and as the saying goes "any given sunday..."
    in that case, they got upset.
    they played rather well despite losing their franchise QB last season (all while not being able to "cheat")
    They've had a revolving door at most positions, and still stayed competitive.
    As much as I dislike them, They were a great franchise.
    i'm not so ignorant as to deny that.
    Oddly enough it was legal until 07'.
    It's still legal to tape the signals from a booth.
    Crazy how things in the gosh darn NFL work out...

    The Patriots are probably the best team.
    That offense is amazing and will only get better.
    The defense has a revamped secondary with Shawn Springs and Leigh Bodden.
    Getting rid of the TD giving Ellis Hobbs and Deltha O'Neal.
    With young talent like Darius Butler, Wheatly, and Wilhit (sp?).
    The only real weakness is lack of OLB.


    I think that team could be better then two years ago, even if the record doesn't show it.

  4. #14
    C Mac D's Avatar
    C Mac D is offline Posting to P'own
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    13,533

    Re: Have we seen the end of the New England dynasty?

    "i_bleed_purple" wrote:
    "C" wrote:
    "gagarr" wrote:
    Ya'll can talk about Moss, Brady, Welker, etc.

    The the NE dynasty is dependant on Belichick, when he goes so goes the dynasty.
    Because there are lots of players that go there to play for Belichick.

    Also, Belichick likes to cheat, which always helps a dynasty
    ;D
    Belichik is the dynasty, eh? So... what happened in Cleveland?

    Don't you think he inherited a pretty good team from the Tuna in the Patriots?

    How many Super Bowls have they won since they've been PROVEN cheating?

    Yeah... seems like it's more the camcorders than it is Belichik.

    keep telling yourself that he's the only coach that has ever done that.


    They went 16-0 the year after being caught cheating, they lost ONE game all year, and as the saying goes "any given sunday..."
    in that case, they got upset.
    they played rather well despite losing their franchise QB last season (all while not being able to "cheat")
    They've had a revolving door at most positions, and still stayed competitive.
    As much as I dislike them, They were a great franchise.
    i'm not so ignorant as to deny that.
    Show me another coach that has... I'll wait.

    I love the people that say, "Everybody was cheating..." In the words of Mike Holmgren, "No... they weren't... that simply isn't true."

    But yet your saying other coaches have done it? Well, that's a strong accusation... I hope you have evidence (whats that... you don't?).


    Also... so, it's still zero Super Bowls since they've been PROVEN cheating then? Right... gotcha.
    Disclaimer: I'm an idiot.

  5. #15
    C Mac D's Avatar
    C Mac D is offline Posting to P'own
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    13,533

    Re: Have we seen the end of the New England dynasty?

    "Yfz01" wrote:
    "i_bleed_purple" wrote:
    "C" wrote:
    "gagarr" wrote:
    Ya'll can talk about Moss, Brady, Welker, etc.

    The the NE dynasty is dependant on Belichick, when he goes so goes the dynasty.
    Because there are lots of players that go there to play for Belichick.

    Also, Belichick likes to cheat, which always helps a dynasty
    ;D
    Belichik is the dynasty, eh? So... what happened in Cleveland?

    Don't you think he inherited a pretty good team from the Tuna in the Patriots?

    How many Super Bowls have they won since they've been PROVEN cheating?

    Yeah... seems like it's more the camcorders than it is Belichik.
    keep telling yourself that he's the only coach that has ever done that.

    They went 16-0 the year after being caught cheating, they lost ONE game all year, and as the saying goes "any given sunday..."
    in that case, they got upset.
    they played rather well despite losing their franchise QB last season (all while not being able to "cheat")
    They've had a revolving door at most positions, and still stayed competitive.
    As much as I dislike them, They were a great franchise.
    i'm not so ignorant as to deny that.
    Oddly enough it was legal until 07'.
    It's still legal to tape the signals from a booth.
    Crazy how things in the gosh darn NFL work out...


    The Patriots are probably the best team.
    That offense is amazing and will only get better.
    The defense has a revamped secondary with Shawn Springs and Leigh Bodden.
    Getting rid of the TD giving Ellis Hobbs and Deltha O'Neal.
    With young talent like Darius Butler, Wheatly, and Wilhit (sp?).
    The only real weakness is lack of OLB.


    I think that team could be better then two years ago, even if the record doesn't show it.
    Please show me the rule that states you can film the other team's play calls and their coaches.
    Disclaimer: I'm an idiot.

  6. #16
    i_bleed_purple's Avatar
    i_bleed_purple is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canadialand
    Posts
    16,778
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Have we seen the end of the New England dynasty?

    "C" wrote:
    "Yfz01" wrote:
    "i_bleed_purple" wrote:
    "C" wrote:
    "gagarr" wrote:
    Ya'll can talk about Moss, Brady, Welker, etc.

    The the NE dynasty is dependant on Belichick, when he goes so goes the dynasty.
    Because there are lots of players that go there to play for Belichick.

    Also, Belichick likes to cheat, which always helps a dynasty
    ;D
    Belichik is the dynasty, eh? So... what happened in Cleveland?

    Don't you think he inherited a pretty good team from the Tuna in the Patriots?

    How many Super Bowls have they won since they've been PROVEN cheating?

    Yeah... seems like it's more the camcorders than it is Belichik.
    keep telling yourself that he's the only coach that has ever done that.

    They went 16-0 the year after being caught cheating, they lost ONE game all year, and as the saying goes "any given sunday..."
    in that case, they got upset.
    they played rather well despite losing their franchise QB last season (all while not being able to "cheat")
    They've had a revolving door at most positions, and still stayed competitive.
    As much as I dislike them, They were a great franchise.
    i'm not so ignorant as to deny that.
    Oddly enough it was legal until 07'.
    It's still legal to tape the signals from a booth.
    Crazy how things in the gosh darn NFL work out...


    The Patriots are probably the best team.
    That offense is amazing and will only get better.
    The defense has a revamped secondary with Shawn Springs and Leigh Bodden.
    Getting rid of the TD giving Ellis Hobbs and Deltha O'Neal.
    With young talent like Darius Butler, Wheatly, and Wilhit (sp?).
    The only real weakness is lack of OLB.


    I think that team could be better then two years ago, even if the record doesn't show it.
    Please show me the rule that states you can film the other team's play calls and their coaches.
    Please show me the rule that states you can't fil the otehr teams' play calls and their coaches from the booth.

  7. #17
    vegasvike's Avatar
    vegasvike is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,277

    Re: Have we seen the end of the New England dynasty?

    "C" wrote:
    "Yfz01" wrote:
    "i_bleed_purple" wrote:
    "C" wrote:
    "gagarr" wrote:
    Ya'll can talk about Moss, Brady, Welker, etc.

    The the NE dynasty is dependant on Belichick, when he goes so goes the dynasty.
    Because there are lots of players that go there to play for Belichick.

    Also, Belichick likes to cheat, which always helps a dynasty
    ;D
    Belichik is the dynasty, eh? So... what happened in Cleveland?

    Don't you think he inherited a pretty good team from the Tuna in the Patriots?

    How many Super Bowls have they won since they've been PROVEN cheating?

    Yeah... seems like it's more the camcorders than it is Belichik.
    keep telling yourself that he's the only coach that has ever done that.

    They went 16-0 the year after being caught cheating, they lost ONE game all year, and as the saying goes "any given sunday..."
    in that case, they got upset.
    they played rather well despite losing their franchise QB last season (all while not being able to "cheat")
    They've had a revolving door at most positions, and still stayed competitive.
    As much as I dislike them, They were a great franchise.
    i'm not so ignorant as to deny that.
    Oddly enough it was legal until 07'.
    It's still legal to tape the signals from a booth.
    Crazy how things in the gosh darn NFL work out...


    The Patriots are probably the best team.
    That offense is amazing and will only get better.
    The defense has a revamped secondary with Shawn Springs and Leigh Bodden.
    Getting rid of the TD giving Ellis Hobbs and Deltha O'Neal.
    With young talent like Darius Butler, Wheatly, and Wilhit (sp?).
    The only real weakness is lack of OLB.


    I think that team could be better then two years ago, even if the record doesn't show it.
    Please show me the rule that states you can film the other team's play calls and their coaches.
    Yeah the one thing some choose to ignore is that while ALL teams may do it, Belicheat had the balls to have someone standing on the opposing sideline and tape.
    I think that it was said that Herm Edwards when he was coaching the Jets even waived to the guy.
    Also how about the allegations that taping was done for the superbowl? Wonder why they didn't beat the giants
    Thanks for the sig Pack93z


    I love when you take breaks from plucking your unibrow and grunting/slapping to makes posts in this forum

  8. #18
    i_bleed_purple's Avatar
    i_bleed_purple is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canadialand
    Posts
    16,778
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Have we seen the end of the New England dynasty?

    "C" wrote:
    "i_bleed_purple" wrote:
    "C" wrote:
    "gagarr" wrote:
    Ya'll can talk about Moss, Brady, Welker, etc.

    The the NE dynasty is dependant on Belichick, when he goes so goes the dynasty.
    Because there are lots of players that go there to play for Belichick.

    Also, Belichick likes to cheat, which always helps a dynasty
    ;D
    Belichik is the dynasty, eh? So... what happened in Cleveland?

    Don't you think he inherited a pretty good team from the Tuna in the Patriots?

    How many Super Bowls have they won since they've been PROVEN cheating?

    Yeah... seems like it's more the camcorders than it is Belichik.

    keep telling yourself that he's the only coach that has ever done that.


    They went 16-0 the year after being caught cheating, they lost ONE game all year, and as the saying goes "any given sunday..."
    in that case, they got upset.
    they played rather well despite losing their franchise QB last season (all while not being able to "cheat")
    They've had a revolving door at most positions, and still stayed competitive.
    As much as I dislike them, They were a great franchise.
    i'm not so ignorant as to deny that.
    Show me another coach that has... I'll wait.

    I love the people that say, "Everybody was cheating..." In the words of Mike Holmgren, "No... they weren't... that simply isn't true."

    But yet your saying other coaches have done it? Well, that's a strong accusation... I hope you have evidence (whats that... you don't?).


    Also... so, it's still zero Super Bowls since they've been PROVEN cheating then? Right... gotcha.
    Ok, you may be right, not EVERYBODY was cheating, but i'm sure there are others who did the same.
    Other coaches have said so (I don't remember who).

    Also.. so your saying if a team doesn't win the superbowl every season,t hey're nothing?
    Just the fact they went 16-0 without "cheating" should tell you there's more to that team than a cheater.
    To say otherwise is pure ignorance.

  9. #19
    C Mac D's Avatar
    C Mac D is offline Posting to P'own
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    13,533

    Re: Have we seen the end of the New England dynasty?

    "i_bleed_purple" wrote:
    "C" wrote:
    "i_bleed_purple" wrote:
    "C" wrote:
    "gagarr" wrote:
    Ya'll can talk about Moss, Brady, Welker, etc.

    The the NE dynasty is dependant on Belichick, when he goes so goes the dynasty.
    Because there are lots of players that go there to play for Belichick.

    Also, Belichick likes to cheat, which always helps a dynasty
    ;D
    Belichik is the dynasty, eh? So... what happened in Cleveland?

    Don't you think he inherited a pretty good team from the Tuna in the Patriots?

    How many Super Bowls have they won since they've been PROVEN cheating?

    Yeah... seems like it's more the camcorders than it is Belichik.

    keep telling yourself that he's the only coach that has ever done that.


    They went 16-0 the year after being caught cheating, they lost ONE game all year, and as the saying goes "any given sunday..."
    in that case, they got upset.
    they played rather well despite losing their franchise QB last season (all while not being able to "cheat")
    They've had a revolving door at most positions, and still stayed competitive.
    As much as I dislike them, They were a great franchise.
    i'm not so ignorant as to deny that.
    Show me another coach that has... I'll wait.

    I love the people that say, "Everybody was cheating..." In the words of Mike Holmgren, "No... they weren't... that simply isn't true."

    But yet your saying other coaches have done it? Well, that's a strong accusation... I hope you have evidence (whats that... you don't?).


    Also... so, it's still zero Super Bowls since they've been PROVEN cheating then? Right... gotcha.
    Ok, you may be right, not EVERYBODY was cheating, but i'm sure there are others who did the same.
    Other coaches have said so (I don't remember who).

    Also.. so your saying if a team doesn't win the superbowl every season,t hey're nothing?
    Just the fact they went 16-0 without "cheating" should tell you there's more to that team than a cheater.
    To say otherwise is pure ignorance.
    LOL... so, you don't remember who... but YOU KNOW other coaches were cheating? That's hilarious.

    So... they still haven't won a Super Bowl since being caught cheating? Funny how that works.
    Disclaimer: I'm an idiot.

  10. #20
    i_bleed_purple's Avatar
    i_bleed_purple is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canadialand
    Posts
    16,778
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Have we seen the end of the New England dynasty?

    "C" wrote:
    "i_bleed_purple" wrote:
    "C" wrote:
    "i_bleed_purple" wrote:
    "C" wrote:
    [quote author=gagarr link=topic=52479.msg972400#msg972400 date=1248284458]
    Ya'll can talk about Moss, Brady, Welker, etc.

    The the NE dynasty is dependant on Belichick, when he goes so goes the dynasty.
    Because there are lots of players that go there to play for Belichick.

    Also, Belichick likes to cheat, which always helps a dynasty
    ;D
    Belichik is the dynasty, eh? So... what happened in Cleveland?

    Don't you think he inherited a pretty good team from the Tuna in the Patriots?

    How many Super Bowls have they won since they've been PROVEN cheating?

    Yeah... seems like it's more the camcorders than it is Belichik.

    keep telling yourself that he's the only coach that has ever done that.


    They went 16-0 the year after being caught cheating, they lost ONE game all year, and as the saying goes "any given sunday..."
    in that case, they got upset.
    they played rather well despite losing their franchise QB last season (all while not being able to "cheat")
    They've had a revolving door at most positions, and still stayed competitive.
    As much as I dislike them, They were a great franchise.
    i'm not so ignorant as to deny that.
    Show me another coach that has... I'll wait.

    I love the people that say, "Everybody was cheating..." In the words of Mike Holmgren, "No... they weren't... that simply isn't true."

    But yet your saying other coaches have done it? Well, that's a strong accusation... I hope you have evidence (whats that... you don't?).


    Also... so, it's still zero Super Bowls since they've been PROVEN cheating then? Right... gotcha.
    Ok, you may be right, not EVERYBODY was cheating, but i'm sure there are others who did the same.
    Other coaches have said so (I don't remember who).

    Also.. so your saying if a team doesn't win the superbowl every season,t hey're nothing?
    Just the fact they went 16-0 without "cheating" should tell you there's more to that team than a cheater.
    To say otherwise is pure ignorance.
    LOL... so, you don't remember who... but YOU KNOW other coaches were cheating? That's hilarious.

    So... they still haven't won a Super Bowl since being caught cheating? Funny how that works.
    [/quote]

    no, I KNOW some other coach said that Bellicheck wasn't the only coach to do that.
    Funny eh?

    And you keep with that last line... maybe soon enough you'll convice someone you're right.
    Lets use your logic there, and say that I guess Jackson is a pile of shit because he's never won a playoff game since week 17.
    But i don't expect you'll pick up on how that comparason works.

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Dynasty League Keeper
    By GALLY in forum Fantasy Football Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-02-2009, 12:55 PM
  2. The Bling Dynasty
    By Vikes_King in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-13-2008, 11:45 PM
  3. Speaking of a dynasty...
    By baumy300 in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-17-2008, 06:49 PM
  4. Bears a Dynasty?
    By mountainviking in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 08-23-2007, 11:23 AM
  5. What Ever Happened To This Dynasty?
    By sleepagent in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-20-2007, 11:22 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •