Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18
  1. #1
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005

    GM says Packers not done

    [size=18px]GM says Packers not done[/size]

    Thompson still hopes to improve team


    Posted: April 4, 2006

    On the Green Bay Packers' Web site a poll asks readers, "Which recent free agent signing will have the greatest impact in 2006?"

    The three choices: wide receiver Marc Boerigter, kicker Billy Cundiff and linebacker Ben Taylor.

    The Packers might want to keep Brett Favre away from their Web site.

    That's hardly a Murderer's Row of free agents who are going to turn the Packers from a 4-12 team to a 12-4 one. Granted, it doesn't include their two biggest free-agent additions - defensive tackle Ryan Pickett and safety Marquand Manuel - but it does speak volumes about what the Packers have accomplished in free agency.

    Especially on offense.

    General manager Ted Thompson has said publicly that he doesn't do things "based on one player or three players or five players" and that his concern will always be the overall good of the Packers, so it's clear he isn't signing players just to please Favre. But he has re-signed a number of offensive players from a team that dropped to 30th overall in offense last year and some wonder whether he wouldn't have been better off replacing them with new faces.

    "We'll have a different offense this year because of a different coaching staff, but I expect some of our guys who were banged up to be back playing and I think that will help certainly quite a bit," Thompson said. "Like I said before, we were 4-12 for a lot of reasons. Part of the reason was my fault, and some of it was our players didn't play to their capability.

    "We're not trying to be cocky and say we're set. I think we're a little bit better than the (team) we were last year. That means we have to get better and we'll try to get better with the people we have and get better if we can find good players on the outside."

    Thompson's only non-Packers signing on offense has been Boerigter, and given the picked-through crop of players still available in free agency the former Kansas City backup receiver will probably stand as the most significant addition of the spring market. Thompson insists that the Packers aren't through adding players and will compete for anyone who is cut or on the trading block, but it's clear his options are limited.

    Thompson said the Packers did go to bat on several bigger-name free agents early in the signing period but found themselves shut out. Whether it was because deals were done before free agency started or the Packers weren’t willing to pay the going rate is unknown.

    The Packers are known to have inquired about Seattle guard Steve Hutchinson and to have considered Dallas guard Larry Allen, Minnesota wide receiver Koren Robinson and Arizona guard Reggie Wells, but all signed with other teams.

    Thompson wouldn't comment on many specifics, but it's not hard to figure out that he wasn't going to play the "poison pill" game with his old club in the pursuit of Hutchinson, wasn't going to get Allen to pick Green Bay over a team close to his California home and wouldn't be able to construct a restricted free agent deal for Wells that the Cardinals wouldn't match (they ended up matching Buffalo's offer sheet).

    "The guys on offense, the higher-profile guys went pretty fast, and quite frankly we didn't think there were that many hot guys out there," Thompson said. "Some of those guys went off the board really fast and it just never worked out.

    "If I felt like at any particular position where we needed help there was one guy who would really give us a boost and there were six who really won't help us and we lose out on the one, it doesn't make sense to go after those other six guys. That's the way I look at it."

    Thompson said he didn't think "there were a ton of premier guys on the offensive side this year" and thought it was more important to re-sign players like running backs Ahman Green and Najeh Davenport, receiver Rod Gardner and tackle Kevin Barry. He said he had no problem taking shots from angry fans who want him to do more, but he said he refused to sign players who he thought couldn't help the Packers.

    Thompson has heard threats from Favre that he will retire if more isn't done to improve the team and criticism from others who question why he hasn't done more after starting the free-agent period with roughly $30 million of salary cap room. The Packers currently have $19 million of room, second most in the National Football League behind San Diego's $19.46 million, but probably won't use much of it because the market is almost dry.

    They are still in the running for Oakland free agent cornerback Charles Woodson, who visited Monday but hasn't received an offer from them yet. The Packers are competing with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers for Woodson's services and have the ability to offer a better contract, but Woodson's familiarity with Buccaneers coach Jon Gruden could be the deal-breaker.

    If Woodson doesn't get a big-money offer, he might wait until after the draft to see if other teams become interested.

    Regardless, Woodson’s addition wouldn’t do much for an offense that ranked 30th in the NFL last year and will be relying heavily on a host of injured starters whose futures aren’t a given. If Green, Davenport, Javon Walker and Terrence Murphy all return to form, the Packers have a chance to be very good on offense. But that’s a big if.
    The most questionable decision Thompson might have made was not going after Robinson, whom he drafted in the first round in Seattle in 2001. Robinson was cut from the Seahawks a year ago after fighting a substance-abuse problem and made the Pro Bowl with the Vikings as a kick returner with a 26-yard average.

    The 6-foot-1, 205-pound Robinson fit the Packers' need for a big receiver and a talented returner, but to get him they would have needed to construct a contract that the Vikings would not match. Robinson was a free agent but had a clause in his previous deal that allowed Minnesota to match any offer.

    The Packers could have constructed an offer that would have cost the Vikings a lot had they matched it and either robbed their division rival of a valuable player or forced them to eat up a lot of salary cap space. Thompson wouldn't say specifically why he didn't try harder to sign Robinson, but either he had reservations about his recovery from alcohol abuse or didn't think he was worth overpaying in an attempt to pry him from the Vikings.

    "If he was just a free agent we probably would have been in there pitching," Thompson said.

    As it stands now, the Packers probably won’t have a chance to do much for their offense in free agency until after the draft, when teams start paring down their rosters. Thompson insists that the Packers aren’t done accumulating talent.

    “We’re not saying we’re sticking pat on offense,” Thompson said. “We’re working every day to get better. Things change. All of a sudden a player becomes available, a trade happens during the draft. There’s some time left. We’re not set in stone.”

    Date changed: The deadline for the roster bonus Favre is due has been moved back to April 15, an NFL source familiar with the deal confirmed. Favre doesn't have to make a decision by then, but the Packers are hoping he does.

    The Packers and agent James "Bus" Cook changed the deadline from April 1 to April 15 on Friday, a day before the bonus was due.

    From the April 5, 2006 editions of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

    GM says Packers not done

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  2. #2
    Caine's Avatar
    Caine is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969

    Re: GM says Packers not done

    Well, I disagree with Thompson. Regardless of what they do, they ARE done this season. Once they admit that they have to commit to a long-term rebuilding period, they'll be much better off...but as long as Favre keeps them dangling, they won't do that.


  3. #3
    Prophet Guest

    Re: GM says Packers not done

    GM says Packers not done
    I saw that title and was wondering if it was possible to be done before you start. I guess it would be possible to start and be done simultaneously if you choose not to do something. I see they have a few pickups,

    I have an ongoing bet with some Packer supporters for a six-pack of local brew every time the Vikes/Pack meet up. I'll be receiving my beer from my Packer buddies for another few years it appears.

  4. #4
    VikesfaninWis's Avatar
    VikesfaninWis is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969

    Re: GM says Packers not done

    After reading this articel, I realized how easy it would have been to lose K-Rob just as easy as we lost Burly. If the cheese would have made a offer similar to what Seattle did with Burly, we would have ate up alot of salary cap, thus not being able to sign Hutch.

    That just proves how great our front office is, and how much of a stand up kind of guy Robinson is to take a deal before FA began.. Thompson is a disgrace to that orginization, he is not what they were hoping to have as far as a GM goes. I don't like the Packers at all, but Ron Wolf was twice the GM that this slapnuts is. Looks like another year in the cellar for the cheese. I am looking so forward to that..

  5. #5
    COJOMAY is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969

    Re: GM says Packers not done

    Favre is just killing this team. He's like a cancer that has spread all over the management and players. Trouble is the fans are just to dumb to realize it. They drafted a pretty good young QB a couple of years back. Give him some playing time rather than kissing Favre's rear and letting him dictate what he will and won't do for the team.
    Culpepper tried that and look where it got him.
    Kentucky Vikes Fan

    When you require nothing, you get nothing; when you expect nothing, you will find nothing; when you embrace nothing, all you will have is nothing.

  6. #6
    cajunvike's Avatar
    cajunvike is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Sep 2004

    Re: GM says Packers not done

    I hear that they are looking at luring Ryan Leaf out of retirement if Favre does retire! LOL!!!

    Just kidding...even the Pukers aren't that stupid...or are they???

  7. #7
    whackthepack is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969

    Re: GM says Packers not done

    Favre the team player! He is on their books for $10 million in salary cap, they would have had 40 million at the start of FA if he would have decided to retire. But to be honest with you, I do not know if Packer's GM Thompson would have had any idea what to do with it anyways.
    What we've got here is failure to communicate.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 1969

    Re: GM says Packers not done

    If they want to compete this season they need to get going, and even signing Arrington, Woodson, and Clements they still woudl have trouple putting together a winning season.

    I also totally agree, Brett needs to make up his mind, I think its clear the only thing he is contemplating is the retirement tour he will get if he comes back.

  9. #9
    shawn9876uss is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Dec 1969

    Re: GM says Packers not done

    Still going? What have they done?

    Thanks PurpleMafia

  10. #10
    viks_fan21's Avatar
    viks_fan21 is offline Asst. Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 1969

    Re: GM says Packers not done

    "WinonaVike" wrote:
    If they want to compete this season they need to get going, and even signing Arrington, Woodson, and Clements they still woudl have trouple putting together a winning season.

    I also totally agree, Brett needs to make up his mind, I think its clear the only thing he is contemplating is the retirement tour he will get if he comes back.
    Yeah, they would have a tough time winning... Especially without those two 1st round picks they would have to give up for Clements.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. **** the Packers!
    By Zeus in forum Trash the Pack
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 01-08-2009, 03:40 PM
  2. Did the Packers get the SOD?
    By Turboe in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 12-22-2005, 09:07 PM
  3. Go Packers?
    By PurpleMafia in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-19-2005, 09:07 AM
  4. Packers win, Vikings lose, Packers win division title?
    By MossWilliamsHenderson in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12-19-2004, 05:49 PM
  5. My take on Packers!
    By skogs02 in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-20-2004, 05:59 PM

Tags for this Thread


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts