Thread: Five facts about the 1987 strike
-
10-31-2007, 06:54 AM #1
Five facts about the 1987 strike
[size=13pt]Five facts about the 1987 strike[/size]
Last Updated 12:41 am PDT Wednesday, October 31, 2007
Story appeared in SPORTS section, Page C1
sacbee.com
Five facts about the 1987 strike..............
"If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"
-
10-31-2007, 07:03 AM #2
Star Spokesman
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 1,993
Re: Five facts about the 1987 strike
Good find Sing, thanks.
Maybe I am reading into it to much.
But, the Redskins went 3-0, and the Vikings went 0-3 in the replacement games.
The Vikings lost the NFC Championship game to the Redskins at Washington.
Without the replacement players in the first 3 games maybe the Vikings would have been hosting the Skins at the Dome.
The Vikings would have won the Super Bowl that year.
I know, it is a reach.
But in light of the dismal season we are in the midst of now it never hurts to dream.
Maybe we would be better off to pray.
-
10-31-2007, 07:10 AM #3
Waterboy
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Posts
- 15
Re: Five facts about the 1987 strike
If we did win... would we want to be known for the team that lost 4 superbowls and the only one we could win was the strike year superbowl?
I think that would sit as well as the 4 we lost.
Similar Threads
-
The 1987 NFL strike: Picking at an old Scab
By Marrdro in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 1Last Post: 06-28-2011, 07:52 PM -
Q&A with Bob Sansevere: Scott Studwell: 1987 Vikings best I've been around
By singersp in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 4Last Post: 11-30-2009, 08:17 AM -
20 years ago, any similarities to the 1987 Vikings.
By vikingivan in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 39Last Post: 12-21-2007, 06:51 AM -
Vikings: Striking memories - The 1987 strike
By singersp in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 1Last Post: 09-23-2007, 11:17 AM -
Could this be 1987 all over again?
By shockzilla in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 16Last Post: 01-03-2005, 04:10 PM



Reply With Quote



Bookmarks