The Final Word Power Poll - 2009 - Week 12 - FINAL

**Zeus** · 12-02-2009, 09:32 AM

Even with the switch to the new format, the staff at TFWPP are dedicated to putting out the MOST objective, LEAST subjective Power Poll in the entire Power Poll universe.

As always, this is based upon the only stat that matters.

Place Team Wins Losses Ties
1st Indianapolis Colts 11 0 0
1st (tie) New Orleans Saints 11 0 0
3rd Minnesota Vikings 10 1 0
4th (tie) Cincinnati Bengals 8 3 0
4th (tie) Dallas Cowboys 8 3 0
4th (tie) San Diego Chargers 8 3 0
7th (tie) Arizona Cardinals 7 4 0
7th (tie) Denver Broncos 7 4 0
7th (tie) Green Bay Packers 7 4 0
7th (tie) New England Patriots 7 4 0
7th (tie) Philadelphia Eagles 7 4 0
12th (tie) Atlanta Falcons 6 5 0
12th (tie) Baltimore Ravens 6 5 0
12th (tie) Jacksonville Jaguars 6 5 0
12th (tie) New York Giants 6 5 0
12th (tie) Pittsburgh Steelers 6 5 0
17th (tie) Houston Texans 5 6 0
17th (tie) Miami Dolphins 5 6 0
17th (tie) New York Jets 5 6 0
17th (tie) San Francisco 49ers 5 6 0
17th (tie) Tennessee Titans 5 6 0
22nd (tie) Buffalo Bills 4 7 0
22nd (tie) Carolina Panthers 4 7 0
22nd (tie) Chicago Bears 4 7 0
22nd (tie) Seattle Seahawks 4 7 0
26th (tie) Kansas City Chiefs 3 8 0
26th (tie) Oakland Raiders 3 8 0
26th (tie) Washington Redskins 3 8 0
29th Detroit Lions 2 9 0
30th (tie) Cleveland Browns 1 10 0
30th (tie) St. Louis Rams 1 10 0
30th (tie) Tampa Bay Buccaneers 1 10 0

=Z=

**midgensa** · 12-02-2009, 09:37 AM

AWZeus wrote:

Even with the switch to the new format, the staff at TFWPP are dedicated to putting out the MOST objective, LEAST subjective Power Poll in the entire Power Poll universe.

As always, this is based upon the only stat that matters.

Place Team Wins Losses Ties
1st Indianapolis Colts 11 0 0
1st (tie) New Orleans Saints 11 0 0
3rd Minnesota Vikings 10 1 0
4th (tie) Cincinnati Bengals 8 3 0
4th (tie) Dallas Cowboys 8 3 0
4th (tie) San Diego Chargers 8 3 0
7th (tie) Arizona Cardinals 7 4 0
7th (tie) Denver Broncos 7 4 0
7th (tie) Green Bay Packers 7 4 0
7th (tie) New England Patriots 7 4 0
7th (tie) Philadelphia Eagles 7 4 0
12th (tie) Atlanta Falcons 6 5 0
12th (tie) Baltimore Ravens 6 5 0
12th (tie) Jacksonville Jaguars 6 5 0
12th (tie) New York Giants 6 5 0
12th (tie) Pittsburgh Steelers 6 5 0
17th (tie) Houston Texans 5 6 0
17th (tie) Miami Dolphins 5 6 0
17th (tie) New York Jets 5 6 0
17th (tie) San Francisco 49ers 5 6 0
17th (tie) Tennessee Titans 5 6 0
22nd (tie) Buffalo Bills 4 7 0
22nd (tie) Carolina Panthers 4 7 0
22nd (tie) Chicago Bears 4 7 0
22nd (tie) Seattle Seahawks 4 7 0
26th (tie) Kansas City Chiefs 3 8 0
26th (tie) Oakland Raiders 3 8 0
26th (tie) Washington Redskins 3 8 0
29th Detroit Lions 2 9 0
30th (tie) Cleveland Browns 1 10 0
30th (tie) St. Louis Rams 1 10 0
30th (tie) Tampa Bay Buccaneers 1 10 0

=Z=

Hmmm ... after reviewing the last few seasons ... I would have to say that this power poll probably should be called TFW REGULAR SEASON PP because if this is the only stat that matters then the Titans were World Champs last season, the Patriots the year before and the Chargers the year before that.

**Zeus** · 12-02-2009, 09:48 AM

midgensa wrote:
Hmmm ... after reviewing the last few seasons ... I would have to say that this power poll probably should be called TFW REGULAR SEASON PP because if this is the only stat that matters then the Titans were World Champs last season, the Patriots the year before and the Chargers the year before that.[/quote]

Power Polls cease to have meaning in a one and done playoff system.

Everyone knows this.

=Z=

**gregair13** · 12-02-2009, 12:30 PM

Browns are too high.

**Marrdro** · 12-02-2009, 02:48 PM

Sneaky Bengals.

**Rockmolder** · 12-02-2009, 03:41 PM

Marrdro wrote:

Sneaky Bengals.

Stumbling Bengals, you mean.

Okay, maybe that's a little premature, but they looked pretty weak against the Browns and the Raiders.

I'd really like to see Palmer win something.

**Marrdro** · 12-03-2009, 09:01 AM

Rockmolder wrote:

Marrdro wrote:

Sneaky Bengals.

Stumbling Bengals, you mean.

Okay, maybe that's a little premature, but they looked pretty weak against the Browns and the Raiders.

I'd really like to see Palmer win something.

Like the Vikes play was stellar against the Browns my friend. Even the Aint's had probs with the bottom dwelling Rams.

**Rockmolder** · 12-03-2009, 09:14 AM

Marrdro wrote:

Rockmolder wrote:

Marrdro wrote:

Sneaky Bengals.

Stumbling Bengals, you mean.

Okay, maybe that's a little premature, but they looked pretty weak against the Browns and the Raiders.

I'd really like to see Palmer win something.

Like the Vikes play was stellar against the Browns my friend. Even the Aint's had probs with the bottom dwelling Rams.

That's true. We'll see how it turns out. I'd like them to at least win one play-off game for Palmer, Zimmer and Lewis/