Feds raid Vick's property again - Video

**singersp** · 07-06-2007, 03:50 PM

[size=13pt]AP: Feds file court docs alleging dogfighting operation associated with Vick property[/size]

July 6, 2007 03:19 PM CDT

The Associated Press is reporting that Federal authorities have filed court documents outlining an alleged dogfighting operation at a property owned by Atlanta Falcons quarterback Michael Vick....

**COJOMAY** · 07-06-2007, 04:07 PM

About time! I want the bum gone when we play 'em the first game!

**BadlandsVikings** · 07-06-2007, 04:19 PM

I hope hope he can find a nice hobby in jail.

**COJOMAY** · 07-06-2007, 04:25 PM

That Michael Vick isn't named in the raid gives me troubles.

**jmcdon00** · 07-06-2007, 04:29 PM

How many times will they raid the place. This is turning into a witch hunt fast. The fact that they haven't filed charges leads me to believe that they wont.

**NodakPaul** · 07-06-2007, 05:10 PM

"jmcdon00" wrote:

How many times will they raid the place. This is turning into a witch hunt fast. The fact that they haven't filed charges leads me to believe that they wont.

They have only searched it twice.
Most crime scenes get searched many more times than that.
You can only look for what and where the warrant specifics.
As you get more information and evidence, you can get expanded search warrants.
Since this search was to look for "more" animal remains, it leads me to believe that some were found during the first search.

I don't think it is a witch hunt.
I think they know that they may have to charge a very, very wealthy man who will bring some of the best attorneys.
They want to make sure their case is air tight first.
And that takes time...

**Json** · 07-06-2007, 05:49 PM

Sure looks as if they are digging up and collecting some things on the video.
Might be Vicks ass if they turn up anything significant such as dead carcasses which is what I've heard is the reason for the search.

**Json** · 07-06-2007, 05:50 PM

They have only searched it twice.
Most crime scenes get searched many more times than that.
You can only look for what and where the warrant specifics.
As you get more information and evidence, you can get expanded search warrants.
Since this search was to look for "more" animal remains, it leads me to believe that some were found during the first search.

I don't think it is a witch hunt.
I think they know that they may have to charge a very, very wealthy man who will bring some of the best attorneys.
They want to make sure their case is air tight first.
And that takes time...

Couldn't have said it better myself.
Good Post Nodak.

**jmcdon00** · 07-06-2007, 06:30 PM

"NodakPaul" wrote:

"jmcdon00" wrote:

How many times will they raid the place. This is turning into a witch hunt fast. The fact that they haven't filed charges leads me to believe that they wont.

They have only searched it twice.
Most crime scenes get searched many more times than that.
You can only look for what and where the warrant specifics.
As you get more information and evidence, you can get expanded search warrants.
Since this search was to look for "more" animal remains, it leads me to believe that some were found during the first search.

I don't think it is a witch hunt.
I think they know that they may have to charge a very, very wealthy man who will bring some of the best attorneys.
They want to make sure their case is air tight first.
And that takes time...

I think the only reason Vicks name was brought into the investigation was because he is famous. The prosecuters should not be targeting one person they should be prosecuting those responsible.
Vick will not be charged. Quote it.

**NodakPaul** · 07-06-2007, 06:42 PM

"jmcdon00" wrote:

"NodakPaul" wrote:

"jmcdon00" wrote:

How many times will they raid the place. This is turning into a witch hunt fast. The fact that they haven't filed charges leads me to believe that they wont.

They have only searched it twice.
Most crime scenes get searched many more times than that.
You can only look for what and where the warrant specifics.
As you get more information and evidence, you can get expanded search warrants.
Since this search was to look for "more" animal remains, it leads me to believe that some were found during the first search.

I don't think it is a witch hunt.
I think they know that they may have to charge a very, very wealthy man who will bring some of the best attorneys.
They want to make sure their case is air tight first.
And that takes time...

I think the only reason Vicks name was brought into the investigation was because he is famous.
The prosecuters should not be targeting one person they should be prosecuting those responsible.
Vick will not be charged. Quote it.

What makes you think that Vick isn't the one responsible?
Since he a) owned the property, b) lied about never going to the property, c) was named by at least one source as a big name in dog fighting, I think he had some responsibility in this.
And the claim that the prosecutes are singling anyone out, especially Vick, is ridiculous, since he wasn't even named in connection with the second warrant.
: