Thread: ESPN "Expert" picks for week 10

yeah picking every game every week 69 percent is pretty good

"ultravikingfan" wrote:

"singersp" wrote:

It's hard for me to call them "experts".

The best of the so called experts, Salisbury is 90-40 (69%)

VikesFan & I have better percentages than they have (75% & 72.% respectively) in our weekly picks & were no "experts" either.

69% is not bad for picks.

I am at 70%. Move over Sean...I am coming for your job!

Well let's just say were beating what ESPN calls"experts" then.

Salisbury is definetely better at picking the winners than he was as a QB in the NFL! :lol:

"singersp" wrote:

"ultravikingfan" wrote:

"singersp" wrote:

It's hard for me to call them "experts".

The best of the so called experts, Salisbury is 90-40 (69%)

VikesFan & I have better percentages than they have (75% & 72.% respectively) in our weekly picks & were no "experts" either.

69% is not bad for picks.

I am at 70%. Move over Sean...I am coming for your job!

Well let's just say were beating what ESPN calls"experts" then.

Salisbury is definetely better at picking the winners than he was as a QB in the NFL! :lol:

Sean was one of our greatest QB's ever!

/BS Off!

someone who is having a pretty good season is Dr. Z from SI. not sure of his record, but he is atleast 20games over 500 which is pretty good. but other wise, if you cant pick over 80%, your not an expect.

i think i'm like 30 games over .500. only at about a 70% winning percentage though

"TroyWilliamson" wrote:

I think we have a great chance of proving them wrong if we can play some solid D and get off to a good start.

hillarious avatar troy willamson