-
02-06-2007, 11:31 AM #1
Colts Not likely to re-sign Rhodes
KFFL
Colts | Not likely to re-sign Rhodes
Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:27:51 -0800
Don Banks, of SI.com, reports the Indianapolis Colts are unlikely to re-sign RB Dominic Rhodes, who is scheduled to become an unrestricted free agent this year.
Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please. Mark Twain
-
02-06-2007, 12:22 PM #2
Re: Colts Not likely to re-sign Rhodes
I could see Atlanta scooping him up if Warrick Dunn doesn't come back...or maybe the Jets (who are probably still kicking themselves for not retaining LaMont Jordan).
BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE
-
02-06-2007, 03:41 PM #3
Re: Colts Not likely to re-sign Rhodes
Rhodes is the kind of back I think that would fit anywhere he goes. I like him, wouldn't mind him in purple.
-
02-06-2007, 04:40 PM #4
Re: Colts Not likely to re-sign Rhodes
"MVIKING7" wrote:
He's gonna wanna go to a team that will make him the feature back...it probably won't be here...we've committed too much to Chester.Rhodes is the kind of back I think that would fit anywhere he goes. I like him, wouldn't mind him in purple.
Better for us to draft someone as Chester's eventual replacement (Adrian Peterson maybe?
;D)BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE
-
02-06-2007, 05:53 PM #5
Re: Colts Not likely to re-sign Rhodes
"cajunvike" wrote:
You say replacement like Chester is old, or that a RB drafted at #7 wouldn't be starting ASAP."MVIKING7" wrote:
He's gonna wanna go to a team that will make him the feature back...it probably won't be here...we've committed too much to Chester.Rhodes is the kind of back I think that would fit anywhere he goes. I like him, wouldn't mind him in purple.
Better for us to draft someone as Chester's eventual replacement (Adrian Peterson maybe?
;D)
I m like a Ja Rule poster, cause I'm off the wall.
-
02-06-2007, 05:57 PM #6
Re: Colts Not likely to re-sign Rhodes
"ItalianStallion" wrote:
Cedric Benson is a SECOND-YEAR RB...drafted at #4...and STILL not starting....so you never know."cajunvike" wrote:
You say replacement like Chester is old, or that a RB drafted at #7 wouldn't be starting ASAP."MVIKING7" wrote:
He's gonna wanna go to a team that will make him the feature back...it probably won't be here...we've committed too much to Chester.Rhodes is the kind of back I think that would fit anywhere he goes. I like him, wouldn't mind him in purple.
Better for us to draft someone as Chester's eventual replacement (Adrian Peterson maybe?
;D)
The important thing is that Peterson would be playing on a ROOKIE contract, while Rhodes is gonna want a BIG payday.BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE
-
02-06-2007, 06:05 PM #7
Re: Colts Not likely to re-sign Rhodes
I think it was mentioned during the Super Bowl that the Colts had tried Rhodes as the starter, and that he was just more effective coming off the bench. Any team would be wise to pick him up. The days of the one "feature" back are about over. Those guys just take too much pounding over a 16 game season.
-
02-06-2007, 08:59 PM #8
Re: Colts Not likely to re-sign Rhodes
The Vikes most likely won't go after him... We have good enough guys to play along side of Chester Taylor...
-
02-06-2007, 09:04 PM #9
Re: Colts Not likely to re-sign Rhodes
Fason proved to me last year he can and will back up Taylor

Similar Threads
-
Colts sign Alexander
By skum in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 8Last Post: 12-03-2008, 10:19 AM -
Rhodes TD with under 2 minutes
By GALLY in forum Fantasy Football TalkReplies: 1Last Post: 10-28-2008, 12:35 AM -
Dominic Rhodes returns to Colts
By singersp in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 1Last Post: 05-08-2008, 06:02 AM -
Colts sign free agent QB Shaun King
By singersp in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 4Last Post: 06-03-2006, 08:17 AM -
Another Patriot gone - Colts sign Vinatieri
By shockzilla in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA ForumReplies: 5Last Post: 03-22-2006, 03:18 AM



Reply With Quote







Bookmarks