Calling the shots in the NFC

**Marrdro** · 04-18-2009, 07:36 AM

http://min.scout.com/2/857383.html

**Marrdro** · 04-19-2009, 07:28 AM

[size=10pt]Calling the shots in the AFC [/size]

http://min.scout.com/2/857615.html

**Marrdro** · 04-19-2009, 07:29 AM

Amazing.
As much as we (mostly me) debate this, no one finds this stuff interesting?

**PurpleTide** · 04-19-2009, 07:48 AM

I would like to see what criteria the triangle of authority use to determine whom they pick, and who is red flagged. I wonder what kinda percentage of red flagged guys go on to be good players, and vice versa what guys that pass don't pan out. This is big business, and if you are a punk, and think you're going to represent a organisation make tons of money, continue hangin' with dolts, you are in for a wake up call.

The days of Pac Man Jones are numbered. Of course their will always be the Raiders, and the Cowpadies that make exceptions, but it seems even they are tired of questionable off-field caracter issue's.

**Marrdro** · 04-19-2009, 07:54 AM

"PurpleTide" wrote:

I would like to see what criteria the triangle of authority use to determine whom they pick, and who is red flagged. I wonder what kinda percentage of red flagged guys go on to be good players, and vice versa what guys that pass don't pan out. This is big business, and if you are a punk, and think you're going to represent a organisation make tons of money, continue hangin' with dolts, you are in for a wake up call.

The days of Pac Man Jones are numbered. Of course their will always be the Raiders, and the Cowpadies that make exceptions, but it seems even they are tired of questionable off-field caracter issue's.

There have been a few articles out there on Spielmans criteria.
I know that VU has had three real good ones in thier mag the last couple of years.

Let me dig around a bit and see what I can find.

**marstc09** · 04-20-2009, 06:41 PM

"Marrdro" wrote:

Amazing.
As much as we (mostly me) debate this, no one finds this stuff interesting?

Who the fuck is John Holler?

**Marrdro** · 04-21-2009, 07:51 AM

"marstc09" wrote:

"Marrdro" wrote:

Amazing.
As much as we (mostly me) debate this, no one finds this stuff interesting?

Who the floop is John Holler?

Another yutz news hack who has a slight edge in credibility over the local yutzs that work for the two local rags up there in the land of 10,000 lakes.

**marstc09** · 04-21-2009, 08:12 AM

"Marrdro" wrote:

"marstc09" wrote:

"Marrdro" wrote:

Amazing.
As much as we (mostly me) debate this, no one finds this stuff interesting?

Who the floop is John Holler?

Another yutz news hack who has a slight edge in credibility over the local yutzs that work for the two local rags up there in the land of 10,000 lakes.

Maybe in your opinion. In mine this guy has no credibility. I did a search for info on him and nothing.

**Marrdro** · 04-21-2009, 09:47 AM

"marstc09" wrote:

"Marrdro" wrote:

"marstc09" wrote:

"Marrdro" wrote:

Amazing.
As much as we (mostly me) debate this, no one finds this stuff interesting?

Who the floop is John Holler?

Another yutz news hack who has a slight edge in credibility over the local yutzs that work for the two local rags up there in the land of 10,000 lakes.

Maybe in your opinion. In mine this guy has no credibility. I did a search for info on him and nothing.

Check Scout.

**marstc09** · 04-21-2009, 10:14 AM

"Marrdro" wrote:

"marstc09" wrote:

"Marrdro" wrote:

"marstc09" wrote:

"Marrdro" wrote:

Amazing.
As much as we (mostly me) debate this, no one finds this stuff interesting?

Who the floop is John Holler?

Another yutz news hack who has a slight edge in credibility over the local yutzs that work for the two local rags up there in the land of 10,000 lakes.

Maybe in your opinion. In mine this guy has no credibility. I did a search for info on him and nothing.

Check Scout.

I did.
He is not even one of the NFL experts. He is some writer for Vikingupdate.com. Again what makes him slightly more credible than Judd?