Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23
  1. #21
    Prophet Guest

    Re: Branch a Seachicken

    "whackthepack" wrote:
    "Prophet" wrote:
    No, that's just the chart they had on KFFL.
    I'm pretty certain he'll bump Burleson back to a #3 behind Jackson and Branch.
    Sorry Prophet I thought that was your prediction (you are the prophet) for their depth chart.

    My apologies!
    ;D

    Here's an article from kffl (fantasy perspective:
    After a ugly situation in New England regarding the status and contract of wide receiver Deion Branch, the New England Patriots traded their disgruntled receiver to the Seattle Seahawks in exchange for a first-round draft choice during 2007.

    According to ESPN.com, the Seahawks previously worked out a financial agreement with Branch on a six-year, $39 million deal that would have paid him $13 million in combined bonuses and about $23 million over the first three years of the deal.

    The Seahawks' need for Branch comes due to some questions at the receiver position, as wide receiver Darrell Jackson has been troubled by an ongoing knee injury, which required additional surgery earlier this year and limited him most of training camp. Tight end Jerramy Stevens (knee) also had surgery during training camp and may not return until October. While Jackson played during Week 1, catching five passes for 47 yards, the team clearly felt the need to upgrade the position.

    Branch (5-9, 193) will now have to adjust to the Seahawks' West Coast offense. He's coming off of a career-best season in receptions (78), yards (998) and touchdowns (5), but it was also the first time in his career he made it a full 16-game season. Where he falls into the pecking order amongst Jackson, offseason acquisition Nate Burleson, Bobby Engram and D.J. Hackett will likely be dictated by how quickly he's able to absorb the offense and build a rapport with quarterback Matt Hasselbeck.
    The addition of Branch could make one of the team's receivers expendable, possibly via trade to another team or an outright release. Provided Jackson's knee holds up and the Seahawks hold onto their receivers, they arguably have the deepest receiving corps in the NFL now.

    As for the Patriots, the addition of a first-round pick next season will be welcomed, but the loss of Branch will be a huge void to fill. The recent addition of Doug Gabriel from the Oakland Raiders has yet to pay any dividends, as he was inactive during Week 1, and his late arrival means it's going to take time to learn the system. Needless to say, when your top-three wideouts are Troy Brown, Reche Caldwell and Brandon Childress your depth is questionable to say the least. Rookie Chad Jackson, a second-round draft choice, has talent, but a hamstring injury sidelined him most of the summer and led to him being inactive during Week 1, too.

    According to a source close to the situation, with the addition of another first-round draft choice next year, the Patriots could begin to dangle that pick to other teams to see what they may be able to obtain in return. All things considered, the pick obtained from the Seahawks should be in the latter portion of the first round next year barring a meltdown on the field this season. On the flipside, the Patriots love to stockpile draft picks so they may just keep their eye on the waiver wire and hold onto the pick while planning for next year.

    From a fantasy standpoint, be prepared to devalue Jackson, Burleson and Engram. While their value won't be determined until Branch finds his role with the squad, it's quite possible each of them will have lesser value than what they had entering the season. Hackett, at this time, should not be on your fantasy roster. Branch is going to swipe production from the top three on the roster, as you don't pay a player $23 million over three years and not force him into the lineup as quickly as possible.

    Consider Branch a No. 3 fantasy receiver with upside potential; however, the upside will clearly be based on how quickly he's able to pick up the West Coast scheme, gel with Hasselbeck and find his true role within the offense. This is definitely an intriguing situation, as it's not clear if Seattle acquired him due to worry over Jackson's knee, due to Burleson being new to the offense or simply because they saw an extreme amount of value in him.

  2. #22
    NordicNed is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    9,511

    Re: Branch a Seachicken

    "PurplePride80" wrote:
    The Seahawks are going all out.

    They're doing everything they can to win it all right now, look how many players they've acquired since the end of the 05/06 NFL season.




    Well, almost everything, two things they didn't do..




    1) Didn't look great against the Lions yesterday....





    2)
    Couldn't bring themselves to swallow the poison pill...Because we have HUTCH..... ;D


    I LOVE THE SMELL OF VICTORY IN THE MORNING AIR.

  3. #23
    Prophet Guest

    Re: Branch a Seachicken

    POSTED 1:05 p.m. EDT; UPDATED 1:12 p.m. EDT, September 11, 2006

    BRANCH DEALT TO SEAHAWKS
    pft.com

    According to Mike Reiss of the Boston Globe, Pats receiver Deion Branch has been traded to the Seattle Seahawks for a first-round choice in the 2007 draft.

    Branch presumably will sign a contract extension with the Seahawks in the near future.

    The move likely renders moot Branch's pending grievances against the Patriots, alleging both that the team reneged on an oral promise to trade him and that the team failed to negotiate a contract extension in good faith.

    The first-rounder figures to be a low pick, since the Seahawks are the odds-on favorite to win the NFC West crown.

    The addition of Branch is, by all appearances, a hedge against the health of receiver Darrell Jackson and the ineffectiveness to date of receiver Nate Burleson, who caught only one pass (but for 36 yards) in his debut with the team.


    Burleson has been struggling to pick up the West Coast offense that the Seahawks use -- who's to say that Branch will figure it out?

    In our view, the move smacks of a potentially desperate effort by a team led by a coach who'd love to win a Super Bowl this year and then ride off into the sunset.
    A better strategy?
    Combine the money that will be paid to Burleson and Branch and keep Pro Bowl guard Steve Hutchinson.



Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Branch listed as inactive
    By Purple Floyd in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-16-2006, 08:14 PM
  2. Deion Branch, a Viking????
    By ForceOfNorse in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-27-2006, 11:34 AM
  3. Branch able to seek trade
    By Navycoach in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 08-27-2006, 01:28 AM
  4. Branch remains delimbed.
    By Prophet in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-23-2006, 10:30 AM
  5. Delimbed Branch frustrated
    By Prophet in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-17-2006, 10:28 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •