[quote author=ejmat link=topic=53747.msg1007231#msg1007231 date=1256050609]
[quote author=snowinapril link=topic=53747.msg1007227#msg1007227 date=1256050140]
Just a thought, we would have a different tune on here if our D would have played well once we got to 27-10 on Sunday vs Bal.
There would be a lot more confidence in here.
That was just one game.
I don't blame us for being a little gun shy to say that we are the team to beat.
Besides, underdog is not that bad of a place to be.
+1 and a very good point SIA.
If the Vikings would have kept them down there would be more confidence in this forum when judging the two teams.
I think the Vikings are as good if not better than the Saints.
The difference is they have played a much tougher schedule (not the the Vikings have been terrible) but the Saints have put teams away.
The only team that played close was the Jets.
The major difference right now is the Saints are using their daggers and the Vikings aren't.
As a fan of Childress I will be the first to say at this point he needs to lay the law down with his coordinators.
Now that they know this is a problem it is up to him to correct.
Childress doesn't call the plays however now that this has developed into an issue it is up to him to resolve it with the coordinators.
Maybe now we can get a for sure answer/assessment on how good or bad Childress is.
Two good posts but lets not forget, this game wasn't the only one this year were the D caused concern to the point that there are a couple of us on here who have been saying all year our D has had issues.
Course those concerns were pooooh pooooohed away.
True. As confident as I am in our defense, they seems to get tired. As much as I hate to say it maybe Bellichek had something in 07. Our defense doesn't have to play 4 quarters because we get three possessions ahead and send in the backups. Then when they do need to play 4 quarters (ie 49ers, Ravens, Packers) we let a comeback possible. Our defense always gives up in the fourth quarter. Whether because we send in our backups, which doesn't scare me, but what does is when we kept them in like the Packer game, Packers got back to make it a 1 TD game against our starters. 49ers marched down the field when they needed to in the fourth. We got a holding call to make it 2 and goal on the 20. Didn't matter. Ravens doesn't worry me. I still blame Paymah and Winfield being out for that defensive collapse at the end of that game.
But this is something fixable by far. We've got more talent than any out there. Just need to mentally get them into it. Hopefully this is a wake up. Im sure the coaching staff will do what my old coach would do. "It's my fault that you guys got tired out there. im sorry. I've been going too soft on you in practice. If current practice gets you to play hard for 45 minutes then maybe practice needs to be harder to get you to play hard for 60." I dont care if they're in the NFL make them do conditioning. Demean them in that way. Because obviously it too hard to go 60 minutes.
Again. Not worried. We let 3 points in the first half of that game. We fixed our tight end problem. The matchup I was looking at the entire game was Todd Heap and our defense since we let McDaniel (whatever the STL TE is), and Vernon Davis do so well and we closed that up because Heap only got like one pass covered every other time I saw him. We'll fix this one and worst comes to come. We'll keep them on the whole game no matter the score.
A PHOD sighting......
Were the hell you been My Farvish Friend?
haha. I know Went through PPO detox there for a while, [size=10pt]but back on the wagon[/size]
. I was simply done arguing the same TJack arguments for an entire offseason. Now we can move on to team. Because even if we dont have an answer to him at this point it doesn't matter and won't matter for another year (or maybe two).