-
06-03-2008, 05:57 AM #1
Bears WR's are a better bunch without Berrian
[size=13pt]Drake: Receivers are better bunch without Berrian[/size]
June 2, 2008
BY BRAD BIGGS bbiggs@suntimes.com
Wide receivers coach Darryl Drake admitted he's prone to hyperbole from time to time. But even after the Bears lost Bernard Berrian, a wide receiver they were willing to invest more than $5million per year in, and released veteran Muhsin Muhammad, Drake sees a better corps of playmakers this season.....

"If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"
-
06-03-2008, 06:02 AM #2
Re: Bears WR's are a better bunch without Berrian
That guy should be president of the Optimist club.
I guess if asked, the coach needs to reply like that...but, I'm not buying what he's selling; at all.
Let me know how that works out for you, I'll be watching.
Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent
----------------------------------------------
As a matter of fact, I do know
-
06-03-2008, 06:14 AM #3
Re: Bears WR's are a better bunch without Berrian
[size=13pt]Chicago: Better Off Without Berrian?[/size]
By Anthony Hall
mvn.com
June 2nd, 2008
This just in: The Chicago Bears are better off without Bernard Berrian…
A bit of sour grapes, eh? It’s OK, Darryl…in Minnesota, we understand what it’s like to convince yourself that you’ll somehow be better off after losing a playmaking receiver....

"If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"
-
Re: Bears WR's are a better bunch without Berrian
What is he supposed to say? That is no more unlikely than things that are said by some of the purple shade wearing club. Of course he is wrong and they will suck this year.

-
06-03-2008, 09:31 AM #5
Re: Bears WR's are a better bunch without Berrian
I actually think that the combination of Hester (speedster), Lloyd (jump balls), Bennett (possession), and Booker (vet) is very comparable to ours. They have an average receiving corps, but still have no one to get the ball to them, or a run game to keep the D honest.
"I hate when threads are destroyed by facts and logic."
- Prophet

Thanks Josdin!
-
06-03-2008, 09:54 AM #6
Team Alumni
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 3,051
Re: Bears WR's are a better bunch without Berrian
they have a deeper group of WRs, but not as good of starters as last year

Pissing on the Pack since 08'
-
06-03-2008, 11:53 PM #7
Re: Bears WR's are a better bunch without Berrian
still don't have a quarterback...
We're bringing purple back.
-
Re: Bears WR's are a better bunch without Berrian
That ranks up there with "The vikings will be a better team without Randy Moss"

-
06-04-2008, 08:48 AM #9
Re: Bears WR's are a better bunch without Berrian
"V" wrote:
Hester is not a real receiver IMOI actually think that the combination of Hester (speedster), Lloyd (jump balls), Bennett (possession), and Booker (vet) is very comparable to ours. They have an average receiving corps, but still have no one to get the ball to them, or a run game to keep the D honest.Rosie O'Donnell is a dude!
-
06-04-2008, 08:56 AM #10
Re: Bears WR's are a better bunch without Berrian
Losing a guy with almost 1000 yards will make a big difference.

Similar Threads
-
Losing Bernard Berrian a gaffe by Bears
By singersp in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 7Last Post: 03-03-2008, 09:32 AM -
Anybody want to see a bunch of jugs next weekend?
By josdin00 in forum The ClubhouseReplies: 13Last Post: 01-31-2008, 03:00 PM -
Bunch of Homers!!
By Ltrey33 in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 7Last Post: 02-06-2006, 05:16 AM -
Face it Were a bunch of Underachievers
By stinggger24 in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 20Last Post: 12-19-2004, 12:03 PM -
Bunch of idiots
By hawaiianvike21 in forum Trash the PackReplies: 6Last Post: 10-13-2003, 01:55 PM



Reply With Quote




Bookmarks