Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25
  1. #21
    NodakPaul's Avatar
    NodakPaul is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    West Fargo, ND
    Posts
    17,604
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Bears a Dynasty?

    "C" wrote:
    "NodakPaul" wrote:
    "C" wrote:
    "NodakPaul" wrote:
    "Zeus" wrote:
    [quote author=SnoBumMN link=topic=36975.msg622412#msg622412 date=1187794588]
    Bears a Dynasty?
    Dynasty, my jiggly butt!
    One Super Bowl since 1985 does not a "dynasty" make.


    I'm being careful calling out Super Bowl Winners - because I certainly consider the Bills of the 1990s to be "dynasty-esque" in their AFC dominance.

    =Z=
    I tend to reserve the dynasty label for a team that actually wins the superbowl more times than not over a period of time.
    The Bills did dominate the AFC, but that isn't enough to achieve dynasty status IMHO.

    But I definately agree with you about the bears.
    One superbowl appearance since 85?
    And a loss at that? No, no dynasty there.
    Are the Twins a dynasty in Baseball then?
    Two world series wins in four years?
    I would say no.
    No kidding?
    [/quote]

    No kidding.
    For the record I also don't consider the Vikings of the 70's to be a dynasty.
    As much as I love the Vikings and the Twins, I think the term dynasty needs to be reserved for very special teams or crappy prime time soap operas.
    Zeus wrote:
    When are you going to realize that picking out the 20 bad throws this year and ignoring the 300 good ones does not make your point?

    =Z=

  2. #22
    mountainviking's Avatar
    mountainviking is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,841

    Re: Bears a Dynasty?

    "Prophet" wrote:
    Nice thread title, it makes me want to cut the archilles tendon of the author.
    Who Me?

    Blame it on Freeman!
    Control the line, control the time, and give your D a chance to shine!!

    "Balance it on end and thats the third side of the coin!!" -wookiefoot

  3. #23
    thevikingfan's Avatar
    thevikingfan is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,489

    Re: Bears a Dynasty?

    You have to win a superbowl to be a dynasty and it aint happening this year

  4. #24
    BloodyHorns82's Avatar
    BloodyHorns82 is offline Jersey Retired Feed The Frog Champion
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    9,691

    Re: Bears a Dynasty?

    We need to let this thread die!
    It makes me sick every time I read "bears" and "dynasty" in the same sentence.

  5. #25
    MetalMike-LoudVike's Avatar
    MetalMike-LoudVike is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,291

    Re: Bears a Dynasty?

    yeah kill it Die thread. I say this the bears are not a dynasty
    one of the tough
    in the NFC but they have Grossman and he alone will lose them 12 games and be sent from chicago and wind up being a fluffer for a sex ed video. This thread makes me feel like I step in dog dung.
    IN THE PITS ON THE RIVER BEDS EVRY VIKING FAN WILL RISE & VAHALLA SHALL REJOICE WITH THE MOST GLORIOUS PRIZE LOMBARDI'S TROPHY

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Have we seen the end of the New England dynasty?
    By Zeus in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 07-22-2009, 07:03 PM
  2. Dynasty League Keeper
    By GALLY in forum Fantasy Football Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-02-2009, 12:55 PM
  3. The Bling Dynasty
    By Vikes_King in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-13-2008, 11:45 PM
  4. Speaking of a dynasty...
    By baumy300 in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-17-2008, 06:49 PM
  5. What Ever Happened To This Dynasty?
    By sleepagent in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-20-2007, 11:22 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •