Thread: bears 37 seahawks 6
-
10-02-2006, 06:31 AM #1
bears 37 seahawks 6
hmm wow the bears D actually held the seahawks offense to 6 points if bears fan weren't so obnoxious then i would admit that they are good. but then they didn't have to deal with alexander, i have looked up some stuff and found that typically when a teams star running back goes down then they don't do near as well, look at the redskins without portis (not taking anything away from our win) they are a much better team with him on the field. is our D that good or is the seachickens D that bad or maybe possibly the bears offense that good....can't be cuz we only allowed them 19 points. but after watching the seahawks get only 6 points i was happy about our 16 points, its not much better but its a start. i didn't watch that game but i did notice griese did come in, what was that about? and also hassleback wasn't there for the whole game. please somebody fill me in.

Thanks Josdin00 for the sig!
-
Re: bears 37 seahawks 6
keep in mind the seahawks d isn't all that.
look at how they did against the giants and that should tell you what kind of defense they have.
-
10-02-2006, 07:30 PM #3
Re: bears 37 seahawks 6
Look at the hawks opener against the lions, it made the lions look good for one game.

-
10-02-2006, 11:28 PM #4
Re: bears 37 seahawks 6
You guys are in denial. The Bears are good. damn good. They'll win the NFC north and at least go to the NFC Championships. I don't know about the bowl yet. we'll see.
Trying to bring rationale to an irrational site
-
10-02-2006, 11:43 PM #5
Re: bears 37 seahawks 6
"davike" wrote:
Lest you forgot, Portis PLAYED against us...quite effectively!hmm wow the bears D actually held the seahawks offense to 6 points if bears fan weren't so obnoxious then i would admit that they are good. but then they didn't have to deal with alexander, i have looked up some stuff and found that typically when a teams star running back goes down then they don't do near as well, look at the redskins without portis (not taking anything away from our win) they are a much better team with him on the field. is our D that good or is the seachickens D that bad or maybe possibly the bears offense that good....can't be cuz we only allowed them 19 points. but after watching the seahawks get only 6 points i was happy about our 16 points, its not much better but its a start. i didn't watch that game but i did notice griese did come in, what was that about? and also hassleback wasn't there for the whole game. please somebody fill me in.
It's the game the next week against Dallass that he sat out...and the Cowturds CLOBBERED the Deadskins!!!
Same thing that happened to the Seachickens when the Bores played them this past Sunday.
Yeah, the Bores are pretty good...but they aren't near invincible...heck, we had to give them a late break for them to beat us...otherwise we would be tied for first right now with them.BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE
-
10-02-2006, 11:54 PM #6
Re: bears 37 seahawks 6
I'm just pulling for a wild card spot. If we pull it together, then great, we've got a shot. but i could see us going 9-7 now. I really could. I don't think that'll be enough to make it in. Next year, with our IR players back and a year under BC's belt. WATCHOUT!
Trying to bring rationale to an irrational site
Similar Threads
-
Official Seahawks/Bears Divisional Thread
By BadlandsVikings in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 5Last Post: 01-16-2011, 11:22 PM -
Lions, Seahawks, and Bears games will not be blacked out
By NodakPaul in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 9Last Post: 11-10-2009, 10:49 PM -
Cris Carter's 65-yard OT Winner against the Bears - and other Anti-Bears Videos
By Zeus in forum Weekly Opponent TalkReplies: 1Last Post: 11-26-2008, 07:01 AM -
Seahawks-Bears Preview
By Prophet in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 6Last Post: 01-13-2007, 10:58 AM -
MOVED: bears 37 seahawks 6
By ultravikingfan in forum Weekly Opponent TalkReplies: 0Last Post: 10-02-2006, 05:52 PM



Reply With Quote





Bookmarks