Thread: Another Gaping Hole in Roger Goodell's Personal Conduct Policy Revealed

[size=12pt]Another Gaping Hole in Roger Goodell's Personal Conduct Policy Revealed[/size]
Posted Aug 1st 2008 12:39PM
by Tom Mantzouranis

Holy balls, that is one mean looking motha f'r who I would not want to fight at a bar.
No wonder to the fact that he broke a guys neck!

I don't see a hole.
It's just logical that he can't punish a player for an act prior to entered the NFL.
If he did it would be really stupid and subject to how far back does he go.

Roger is doing a great job of trying to curb all the stupidity.
I'm just waiting to see the fines he hands down to the teams for miss behaving players.
Benson should be good for a $100K easy.

I gotta say one thing for Childress he seems to be running a tight ship.

your right about childress.
The way he handled McKinney, pure class and dedication towards making players accountable for their actions.

"i_bleed_purple" wrote:

your right about childress.
The way he handled McKinney, pure class and dedication towards making players accountable for their actions.

How exactly did he handle McKinnie?
Nothing has happened yet...

[size=12pt]Another Gaping Hole in Roger Goodell's Personal Conduct Policy Revealed[/size]

Even though the case was settled after Cherilus became a member of the NFL, he will not be punished, according to league spokesman Greg Aiello, because "incident occurred prior to his NFL career."
http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2008/08/01/another-gaping-hole-in-roger-goodells-personal-conduct-policy-r/

[size=12pt]Bradshaw not going to be fined by league[/size]

A league source confirmed what was reported a little while ago on the NFL Network, that the league has determined that whatever it was that Bradshaw did to violate his probation, it occurred prior to the start of his NFL career. As a result, it is not subject to punishment under the NFL’s personal conduct policy.
http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/giants/2008/07/bradshaw-not-going-to-be-fined.html

So where's the hole? He handled two players exactly the same way. In the same week even.

If the hack who wrote the Cherilus article can't even go back a few days to find something to fill his "gaping hole", he shouldn't be writing professionally.

"gagarr" wrote:

I don't see a hole.
It's just logical that he can't punish a player for an act prior to entered the NFL.
If he did it would be really stupid and subject to how far back does he go.

Roger is doing a great job of trying to curb all the stupidity.
I'm just waiting to see the fines he hands down to the teams for miss behaving players.
Benson should be good for a $100K easy.

I gotta say one thing for Childress he seems to be running a tight ship.

Agreed.
It is hard to punish someone for something that happened before their NFL career.
If Goodell did that, the next thing people would be arguing is a suspension for crap that happened in high school.

Even though the case was settled after Cherilus became a member of the NFL, he will not be punished, according to league spokesman Greg Aiello, because "incident occurred prior to his NFL career."

"Mr" wrote:

[size=12pt]Another Gaping Hole in Roger Goodell's Personal Conduct Policy Revealed[/size]

Even though the case was settled after Cherilus became a member of the NFL, he will not be punished, according to league spokesman Greg Aiello, because "incident occurred prior to his NFL career."
http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2008/08/01/another-gaping-hole-in-roger-goodells-personal-conduct-policy-r/

[size=12pt]Bradshaw not going to be fined by league[/size]

A league source confirmed what was reported a little while ago on the NFL Network, that the league has determined that whatever it was that Bradshaw did to violate his probation, it occurred prior to the start of his NFL career. As a result, it is not subject to punishment under the NFL’s personal conduct policy.
http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/giants/2008/07/bradshaw-not-going-to-be-fined.html

So where's the hole? He handled two players exactly the same way. In the same week even.

If the hack who wrote the first article can't even go back a few days to find something to fill his "gaping hole." He shouldn't be writing professionally.

+1

We shouldn't be allowed to read anything anymore.
LOL!
90 some percent of writers seem to be editors now days.
They don't want to report anything.
They want to comment.


Just the facts mam, just the facts, where is the investigating now days.

I don't see a problem with that policy at all.