Thread: 2008 Strength of Schedule
-
2008 Strength of Schedule
Vikings right up there!
2008 NFL Strength of Schedule
Team 2007 Pct./W-L
Pittsburgh Steelers .598 / 153-103
Indianapolis Colts .594 / 152-104
Jacksonville Jaguars .559 / 143-113
Minnesota Vikings .551 / 141-115
Baltimore Ravens .551 / 141-115
Cincinnati Bengals .547 / 140-116
Cleveland Browns .547 / 140-116
Houston Texans .547 / 140-116
Detroit Lions .543 / 139-117
Tennessee Titans .543 / 139-117
Chicago Bears .531 / 136-120
Green Bay Packers .531 / 136-120
Dallas Cowboys .523 / 134-122
Washington Redskins .523 / 134-122
NY Giants .520 / 133-123
Philadelphia Eagles .520 / 133-123
St. Louis Rams .488 / 125-131
San Francisco 49ers .484 / 124-132
Seattle Seahawks .477 / 122-134
Tampa Bay Buccaneers .469 / 120-136
Arizona Cardinals .465 / 119-137
Carolina Panthers .465 / 119-137
Miami Dolphins .465 / 119-137
Atlanta Falcons .461 / 118-138
NY Jets .457 / 117-139
Kansas City Chiefs .453 / 116-140
Buffalo Bills .449 / 115-141
New Orleans Saints .449 / 115-141
Denver Broncos .445 / 114-142
Oakland Raiders .438 / 112-144
San Diego Chargers .422 / 108-148
New England Patriots .387 / 99-157
-
09-05-2008, 09:48 AM #2
Re: 2008 Strength of Schedule
"Webby" wrote:
Meaningless.Vikings right up there!
2008 NFL Strength of Schedule
Team 2007 Pct./W-L
Pittsburgh Steelers .598 / 153-103
Indianapolis Colts .594 / 152-104
Jacksonville Jaguars .559 / 143-113
Minnesota Vikings .551 / 141-115
Baltimore Ravens .551 / 141-115
Cincinnati Bengals .547 / 140-116
Cleveland Browns .547 / 140-116
Houston Texans .547 / 140-116
Detroit Lions .543 / 139-117
Tennessee Titans .543 / 139-117
Chicago Bears .531 / 136-120
Green Bay Packers .531 / 136-120
Dallas Cowboys .523 / 134-122
Washington Redskins .523 / 134-122
NY Giants .520 / 133-123
Philadelphia Eagles .520 / 133-123
St. Louis Rams .488 / 125-131
San Francisco 49ers .484 / 124-132
Seattle Seahawks .477 / 122-134
Tampa Bay Buccaneers .469 / 120-136
Arizona Cardinals .465 / 119-137
Carolina Panthers .465 / 119-137
Miami Dolphins .465 / 119-137
Atlanta Falcons .461 / 118-138
NY Jets .457 / 117-139
Kansas City Chiefs .453 / 116-140
Buffalo Bills .449 / 115-141
New Orleans Saints .449 / 115-141
Denver Broncos .445 / 114-142
Oakland Raiders .438 / 112-144
San Diego Chargers .422 / 108-148
New England Patriots .387 / 99-157
The Patriots are the lowest because they play the 1-15 (in 2007) Miami Dolphins two times, for example.
=Z=
Thanks to Josdin for the awesome sig!
-
09-05-2008, 09:50 AM #3
Re: 2008 Strength of Schedule
"Zeus" wrote:
Actually, the Dolphins are 0-0... I got that off your power rankings."Webby" wrote:
Meaningless.Vikings right up there!
2008 NFL Strength of Schedule
Team 2007 Pct./W-L
Pittsburgh Steelers .598 / 153-103
Indianapolis Colts .594 / 152-104
Jacksonville Jaguars .559 / 143-113
Minnesota Vikings .551 / 141-115
Baltimore Ravens .551 / 141-115
Cincinnati Bengals .547 / 140-116
Cleveland Browns .547 / 140-116
Houston Texans .547 / 140-116
Detroit Lions .543 / 139-117
Tennessee Titans .543 / 139-117
Chicago Bears .531 / 136-120
Green Bay Packers .531 / 136-120
Dallas Cowboys .523 / 134-122
Washington Redskins .523 / 134-122
NY Giants .520 / 133-123
Philadelphia Eagles .520 / 133-123
St. Louis Rams .488 / 125-131
San Francisco 49ers .484 / 124-132
Seattle Seahawks .477 / 122-134
Tampa Bay Buccaneers .469 / 120-136
Arizona Cardinals .465 / 119-137
Carolina Panthers .465 / 119-137
Miami Dolphins .465 / 119-137
Atlanta Falcons .461 / 118-138
NY Jets .457 / 117-139
Kansas City Chiefs .453 / 116-140
Buffalo Bills .449 / 115-141
New Orleans Saints .449 / 115-141
Denver Broncos .445 / 114-142
Oakland Raiders .438 / 112-144
San Diego Chargers .422 / 108-148
New England Patriots .387 / 99-157
The Patriots are the lowest because they play the 1-15 (in 2007) Miami Dolphins two times, for example.
=Z=Disclaimer: I'm an idiot.
-
09-05-2008, 09:51 AM #4
Re: 2008 Strength of Schedule
It will be good to win with a hard schedule.
Keep our guys trying hard every week.
Adversity is the best team builder.Its better to lose the first game than the last one.
-
09-05-2008, 09:51 AM #5
Re: 2008 Strength of Schedule
"C" wrote:
Did you miss the "in 2007" blurb?"Zeus" wrote:
Actually, the Dolphins are 0-0... I got that off your power rankings."Webby" wrote:
Meaningless.Vikings right up there!
2008 NFL Strength of Schedule
Team 2007 Pct./W-L
Pittsburgh Steelers .598 / 153-103
Indianapolis Colts .594 / 152-104
Jacksonville Jaguars .559 / 143-113
Minnesota Vikings .551 / 141-115
Baltimore Ravens .551 / 141-115
Cincinnati Bengals .547 / 140-116
Cleveland Browns .547 / 140-116
Houston Texans .547 / 140-116
Detroit Lions .543 / 139-117
Tennessee Titans .543 / 139-117
Chicago Bears .531 / 136-120
Green Bay Packers .531 / 136-120
Dallas Cowboys .523 / 134-122
Washington Redskins .523 / 134-122
NY Giants .520 / 133-123
Philadelphia Eagles .520 / 133-123
St. Louis Rams .488 / 125-131
San Francisco 49ers .484 / 124-132
Seattle Seahawks .477 / 122-134
Tampa Bay Buccaneers .469 / 120-136
Arizona Cardinals .465 / 119-137
Carolina Panthers .465 / 119-137
Miami Dolphins .465 / 119-137
Atlanta Falcons .461 / 118-138
NY Jets .457 / 117-139
Kansas City Chiefs .453 / 116-140
Buffalo Bills .449 / 115-141
New Orleans Saints .449 / 115-141
Denver Broncos .445 / 114-142
Oakland Raiders .438 / 112-144
San Diego Chargers .422 / 108-148
New England Patriots .387 / 99-157
The Patriots are the lowest because they play the 1-15 (in 2007) Miami Dolphins two times, for example.
2008's strength of schedule is based off of the totally meaningless for 2008 stat of wins and losses in 2007.
=Z=
Thanks to Josdin for the awesome sig!
-
09-05-2008, 09:53 AM #6
Re: 2008 Strength of Schedule
Touche... to be honest though, the Patriots could make another serious run at 16-0.
Disclaimer: I'm an idiot.
-
09-05-2008, 10:11 AM #7
Re: 2008 Strength of Schedule
"Zeus" wrote:
See, now THIS would be an appropriate thread to post your 0-0 power rankings to remind everyone that the past does not matter."C" wrote:
Did you miss the "in 2007" blurb?"Zeus" wrote:
Actually, the Dolphins are 0-0... I got that off your power rankings."Webby" wrote:
Meaningless.Vikings right up there!
2008 NFL Strength of Schedule
Team 2007 Pct./W-L
Pittsburgh Steelers .598 / 153-103
Indianapolis Colts .594 / 152-104
Jacksonville Jaguars .559 / 143-113
Minnesota Vikings .551 / 141-115
Baltimore Ravens .551 / 141-115
Cincinnati Bengals .547 / 140-116
Cleveland Browns .547 / 140-116
Houston Texans .547 / 140-116
Detroit Lions .543 / 139-117
Tennessee Titans .543 / 139-117
Chicago Bears .531 / 136-120
Green Bay Packers .531 / 136-120
Dallas Cowboys .523 / 134-122
Washington Redskins .523 / 134-122
NY Giants .520 / 133-123
Philadelphia Eagles .520 / 133-123
St. Louis Rams .488 / 125-131
San Francisco 49ers .484 / 124-132
Seattle Seahawks .477 / 122-134
Tampa Bay Buccaneers .469 / 120-136
Arizona Cardinals .465 / 119-137
Carolina Panthers .465 / 119-137
Miami Dolphins .465 / 119-137
Atlanta Falcons .461 / 118-138
NY Jets .457 / 117-139
Kansas City Chiefs .453 / 116-140
Buffalo Bills .449 / 115-141
New Orleans Saints .449 / 115-141
Denver Broncos .445 / 114-142
Oakland Raiders .438 / 112-144
San Diego Chargers .422 / 108-148
New England Patriots .387 / 99-157
The Patriots are the lowest because they play the 1-15 (in 2007) Miami Dolphins two times, for example.
2008's strength of schedule is based off of the totally meaningless for 2008 stat of wins and losses in 2007.
=Z=
It can show trends, but the fact is that anything can happen in a new season and all that matters is Wins/losses (/ties)
Similar Threads
-
Big 2008 Schedule Bar Banners
By acman1 in forum The ClubhouseReplies: 35Last Post: 07-10-2008, 06:33 PM -
(Merged) 2008 Schedule ...?
By ultravikingfan in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA ForumReplies: 0Last Post: 03-10-2008, 10:50 AM -
Strength Of Schedule
By COJOMAY in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 9Last Post: 09-20-2007, 06:02 PM -
Strength of Schedule
By YogidAbEAR in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 4Last Post: 07-16-2006, 09:41 PM -
2005 Strength of Schedule & Travel
By Webby in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 5Last Post: 09-10-2005, 06:48 AM



Reply With Quote



Bookmarks